[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1efdb870-cac2-f6ed-72b5-d0550dbb5257@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2023 12:08:18 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: "Tilki, Ibrahim" <Ibrahim.Tilki@...log.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Cc: "a.zummo@...ertech.it" <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
"jdelvare@...e.com" <jdelvare@...e.com>,
"linux@...ck-us.net" <linux@...ck-us.net>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org"
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
"linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"Arslanbenzer, Zeynep" <Zeynep.Arslanbenzer@...log.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] dt-bindings: rtc: add max313xx RTCs
On 04/04/2023 11:26, Tilki, Ibrahim wrote:
>>>> + aux-voltage-chargeable:
>>>> + enum: [0, 1, 2]
>>>> + description: |
>>>> + Enables trickle charger.
>>>> + 0: Charger is disabled (default)
>>>> + 1: Charger is enabled
>>>> + 2: Charger is enabled with a diode
>>>
>>> 2 is not an allowed value. I asked to drop this property. It is coming
>>> from rtc.yaml. I also do not understand "with a diode". So otherwise it
>>> is charging with, I don't know, FET?
>>
>> No, what is not explained here (and maybe not unsterstood by the
>> submitter) is that the RTC has an extra diode so, charging will always
>> enable a diode, select a resistor and then have or not an extra diode.
>> Figure2 of the MAX31329 datasheet is great.
>>
>
> That is exactly why I had "adi,trickle-diode-enable" property in previous patch.
> So if I can't have "adi,trickle-diode-enable" and can't add an additional value
> to "aux-voltage-chargeable", I am not sure how to add support for the extra
> diode at this point.
Ask the person who asked you to remove adi,trickle-diode-enable...
Anyway even if you decided to go with such advise, the solution is not
to create binding which fails.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists