Date:   Tue, 04 Apr 2023 12:11:47 +0200
From:   Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
To:     Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>,
        Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>,
        Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
        Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
        Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>,
        David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>,
        Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>, Abel Vesa <abelvesa@...nel.org>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org>,
        Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
        Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
        Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
        Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>,
        Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
        Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-actions@...ts.infradead.org, patches@...nsource.cirrus.com,
        linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
Subject: [PATCH v3 57/65] clk: ingenic: tcu: Switch to determine_rate

The Ingenic TCU clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.

This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.

The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.

So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().

The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can
change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the
parent.

However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not.

Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's
convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which
will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an
oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on.

Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
---
 drivers/clk/ingenic/tcu.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/ingenic/tcu.c b/drivers/clk/ingenic/tcu.c
index d5544cbc5c48..7d04ef40b7cf 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/ingenic/tcu.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/ingenic/tcu.c
@@ -178,18 +178,21 @@ static u8 ingenic_tcu_get_prescale(unsigned long rate, unsigned long req_rate)
 	return 5; /* /1024 divider */
 }
 
-static long ingenic_tcu_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long req_rate,
-		unsigned long *parent_rate)
+static int ingenic_tcu_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
+				      struct clk_rate_request *req)
 {
-	unsigned long rate = *parent_rate;
+	unsigned long rate = req->best_parent_rate;
 	u8 prescale;
 
-	if (req_rate > rate)
-		return rate;
+	if (req->rate > rate) {
+		req->rate = rate;
+		return 0;
+	}
 
-	prescale = ingenic_tcu_get_prescale(rate, req_rate);
+	prescale = ingenic_tcu_get_prescale(rate, req->rate);
 
-	return rate >> (prescale * 2);
+	req->rate = rate >> (prescale * 2);
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static int ingenic_tcu_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long req_rate,
@@ -219,7 +222,7 @@ static const struct clk_ops ingenic_tcu_clk_ops = {
 	.set_parent	= ingenic_tcu_set_parent,
 
 	.recalc_rate	= ingenic_tcu_recalc_rate,
-	.round_rate	= ingenic_tcu_round_rate,
+	.determine_rate	= ingenic_tcu_determine_rate,
 	.set_rate	= ingenic_tcu_set_rate,
 
 	.enable		= ingenic_tcu_enable,

-- 
2.39.2

Powered by blists - more mailing lists