lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 4 Apr 2023 17:54:51 +0300
From:   Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] string: implement streq()

On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 02:16:41PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Apr 2023 20:48:05 +0300 Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> > Most of the time strcmp() is being used, strings are checked for equality.
> > Add wrapper to relay such intent (it is shorter to type, too).
> > 
> > Use
> > 	if (streq(s, "s")) {
> > 	}
> > or
> > 	if (!streq(s, "s")) {
> > 	}
> 
> Gee, do we really want this?  I mean, we all know how strcmp() works,
> don't we?
> 
> I'm thinking it would be better to remove the various cute little
> streq() macros and open-code strcmp(...)==0.

No! It's cool, trust me. Try it out, you'll like it.
We "know" how strcmp() works because C didn't have streq() from
the very beginning.

strcmp() is only for insertion into trees. Half of the time you need
to read to the end of the expression to know if it is check for equality
or inequality. With streq(), you don't.

	stralexey

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ