linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-imx: fix MX51_ECSPI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <168062166496.53383.6928239606358306120.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 04 Apr 2023 16:21:04 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
        linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Kevin Groeneveld <kgroeneveld@...brook.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-imx: fix MX51_ECSPI_* macros when cs > 3

On Sat, 18 Mar 2023 18:21:32 -0400, Kevin Groeneveld wrote:
> When using gpio based chip select the cs value can go outside the range
> 0 – 3. The various MX51_ECSPI_* macros did not take this into consideration
> resulting in possible corruption of the configuration.
> 
> For example for any cs value over 3 the SCLKPHA bits would not be set and
> other values in the register possibly corrupted.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] spi: spi-imx: fix MX51_ECSPI_* macros when cs > 3
      commit: 87c614175bbf28d3fd076dc2d166bac759e41427

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark