| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20230405185427.1246289-3-yosryahmed@google.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2023 18:54:27 +0000
From: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 2/2] mm: vmscan: refactor reclaim_state helpers
During reclaim, we keep track of pages reclaimed from other means than
LRU-based reclaim through scan_control->reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab,
which we stash a pointer to in current task_struct.
However, we keep track of more than just reclaimed slab pages through
this. We also use it for clean file pages dropped through pruned inodes,
and xfs buffer pages freed. Rename reclaimed_slab to reclaimed, and add
a helper function that wraps updating it through current, so that future
changes to this logic are contained within mm/vmscan.c.
Additionally, add a flush_reclaim_state() helper to wrap using
reclaim_state->reclaimed to updated sc->nr_reclaimed, and use that
helper to add an elaborate comment about why we only do the update for
global reclaim.
Finally, move set_task_reclaim_state() next to flush_reclaim_state() so
that all reclaim_state helpers are in close proximity for easier
readability.
Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>
---
fs/inode.c | 3 +-
fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 3 +-
include/linux/swap.h | 17 +++++++++-
mm/slab.c | 3 +-
mm/slob.c | 6 ++--
mm/slub.c | 5 ++-
mm/vmscan.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
7 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
index 4558dc2f13557..e60fcc41faf17 100644
--- a/fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/inode.c
@@ -864,8 +864,7 @@ static enum lru_status inode_lru_isolate(struct list_head *item,
__count_vm_events(KSWAPD_INODESTEAL, reap);
else
__count_vm_events(PGINODESTEAL, reap);
- if (current->reclaim_state)
- current->reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab += reap;
+ mm_account_reclaimed_pages(reap);
}
iput(inode);
spin_lock(lru_lock);
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
index 54c774af6e1c6..15d1e5a7c2d34 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
@@ -286,8 +286,7 @@ xfs_buf_free_pages(
if (bp->b_pages[i])
__free_page(bp->b_pages[i]);
}
- if (current->reclaim_state)
- current->reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab += bp->b_page_count;
+ mm_account_reclaimed_pages(bp->b_page_count);
if (bp->b_pages != bp->b_page_array)
kmem_free(bp->b_pages);
diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h
index 209a425739a9f..e131ac155fb95 100644
--- a/include/linux/swap.h
+++ b/include/linux/swap.h
@@ -153,13 +153,28 @@ union swap_header {
* memory reclaim
*/
struct reclaim_state {
- unsigned long reclaimed_slab;
+ /* pages reclaimed outside of LRU-based reclaim */
+ unsigned long reclaimed;
#ifdef CONFIG_LRU_GEN
/* per-thread mm walk data */
struct lru_gen_mm_walk *mm_walk;
#endif
};
+/*
+ * mm_account_reclaimed_pages(): account reclaimed pages outside of LRU-based
+ * reclaim
+ * @pages: number of pages reclaimed
+ *
+ * If the current process is undergoing a reclaim operation, increment the
+ * number of reclaimed pages by @pages.
+ */
+static inline void mm_account_reclaimed_pages(unsigned long pages)
+{
+ if (current->reclaim_state)
+ current->reclaim_state->reclaimed += pages;
+}
+
#ifdef __KERNEL__
struct address_space;
diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
index dabc2a671fc6f..64bf1de817b24 100644
--- a/mm/slab.c
+++ b/mm/slab.c
@@ -1392,8 +1392,7 @@ static void kmem_freepages(struct kmem_cache *cachep, struct slab *slab)
smp_wmb();
__folio_clear_slab(folio);
- if (current->reclaim_state)
- current->reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab += 1 << order;
+ mm_account_reclaimed_pages(1 << order);
unaccount_slab(slab, order, cachep);
__free_pages(&folio->page, order);
}
diff --git a/mm/slob.c b/mm/slob.c
index fe567fcfa3a39..79cc8680c973c 100644
--- a/mm/slob.c
+++ b/mm/slob.c
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/mm.h>
-#include <linux/swap.h> /* struct reclaim_state */
+#include <linux/swap.h> /* mm_account_reclaimed_pages() */
#include <linux/cache.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/export.h>
@@ -211,9 +211,7 @@ static void slob_free_pages(void *b, int order)
{
struct page *sp = virt_to_page(b);
- if (current->reclaim_state)
- current->reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab += 1 << order;
-
+ mm_account_reclaimed_pages(1 << order);
mod_node_page_state(page_pgdat(sp), NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE_B,
-(PAGE_SIZE << order));
__free_pages(sp, order);
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 39327e98fce34..7aa30eef82350 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
*/
#include <linux/mm.h>
-#include <linux/swap.h> /* struct reclaim_state */
+#include <linux/swap.h> /* mm_account_reclaimed_pages() */
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/bit_spinlock.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
@@ -2063,8 +2063,7 @@ static void __free_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab)
/* Make the mapping reset visible before clearing the flag */
smp_wmb();
__folio_clear_slab(folio);
- if (current->reclaim_state)
- current->reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab += pages;
+ mm_account_reclaimed_pages(pages);
unaccount_slab(slab, order, s);
__free_pages(&folio->page, order);
}
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index c82bd89f90364..049e39202e6ce 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -188,18 +188,6 @@ struct scan_control {
*/
int vm_swappiness = 60;
-static void set_task_reclaim_state(struct task_struct *task,
- struct reclaim_state *rs)
-{
- /* Check for an overwrite */
- WARN_ON_ONCE(rs && task->reclaim_state);
-
- /* Check for the nulling of an already-nulled member */
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!rs && !task->reclaim_state);
-
- task->reclaim_state = rs;
-}
-
LIST_HEAD(shrinker_list);
DECLARE_RWSEM(shrinker_rwsem);
@@ -511,6 +499,59 @@ static bool writeback_throttling_sane(struct scan_control *sc)
}
#endif
+static void set_task_reclaim_state(struct task_struct *task,
+ struct reclaim_state *rs)
+{
+ /* Check for an overwrite */
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(rs && task->reclaim_state);
+
+ /* Check for the nulling of an already-nulled member */
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!rs && !task->reclaim_state);
+
+ task->reclaim_state = rs;
+}
+
+/*
+ * flush_reclaim_state(): add pages reclaimed outside of LRU-based reclaim to
+ * scan_control->nr_reclaimed.
+ */
+static void flush_reclaim_state(struct scan_control *sc,
+ struct reclaim_state *rs)
+{
+ /*
+ * Currently, reclaim_state->reclaimed includes three types of pages
+ * freed outside of vmscan:
+ * (1) Slab pages.
+ * (2) Clean file pages from pruned inodes.
+ * (3) XFS freed buffer pages.
+ *
+ * For all of these cases, we have no way of finding out whether these
+ * pages were related to the memcg under reclaim. For example, a freed
+ * slab page could have had only a single object charged to the memcg
+ * under reclaim. Also, populated inodes are not on shrinker LRUs
+ * anymore except on highmem systems.
+ *
+ * Instead of over-reporting the reclaimed pages in a memcg reclaim,
+ * only count such pages in global reclaim. This prevents unnecessary
+ * retries during memcg charging and false positive from proactive
+ * reclaim (memory.reclaim).
+ *
+ * For uncommon cases were the freed pages were actually significantly
+ * charged to the memcg under reclaim, and we end up under-reporting, it
+ * should be fine. The freed pages will be uncharged anyway, even if
+ * they are not reported properly, and we will be able to make forward
+ * progress in charging (which is usually in a retry loop).
+ *
+ * We can go one step further, and report the uncharged objcg pages in
+ * memcg reclaim, to make reporting more accurate and reduce
+ * under-reporting, but it's probably not worth the complexity for now.
+ */
+ if (rs && global_reclaim(sc)) {
+ sc->nr_reclaimed += rs->reclaimed;
+ rs->reclaimed = 0;
+ }
+}
+
static long xchg_nr_deferred(struct shrinker *shrinker,
struct shrink_control *sc)
{
@@ -5346,10 +5387,7 @@ static int shrink_one(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
vmpressure(sc->gfp_mask, memcg, false, sc->nr_scanned - scanned,
sc->nr_reclaimed - reclaimed);
- if (global_reclaim(sc)) {
- sc->nr_reclaimed += current->reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab;
- current->reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab = 0;
- }
+ flush_reclaim_state(sc, current->reclaim_state);
return success ? MEMCG_LRU_YOUNG : 0;
}
@@ -6474,10 +6512,7 @@ static void shrink_node(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
shrink_node_memcgs(pgdat, sc);
- if (reclaim_state && global_reclaim(sc)) {
- sc->nr_reclaimed += reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab;
- reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab = 0;
- }
+ flush_reclaim_state(sc, reclaim_state);
/* Record the subtree's reclaim efficiency */
if (!sc->proactive)
--
2.40.0.348.gf938b09366-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists