linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm/mmu_gather: send tlb_remove_table_smp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZC3P3Ds/BIcpRNGr@tpad>
Date:   Wed, 5 Apr 2023 16:45:32 -0300
From:   Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
To:     Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Cc:     Yair Podemsky <ypodemsk@...hat.com>, linux@...linux.org.uk,
        mpe@...erman.id.au, npiggin@...il.com, christophe.leroy@...roup.eu,
        hca@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com, agordeev@...ux.ibm.com,
        borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com, svens@...ux.ibm.com,
        davem@...emloft.net, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
        bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org,
        hpa@...or.com, will@...nel.org, aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, peterz@...radead.org, arnd@...db.de,
        keescook@...omium.org, paulmck@...nel.org, jpoimboe@...nel.org,
        samitolvanen@...gle.com, ardb@...nel.org,
        juerg.haefliger@...onical.com, rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk,
        geert+renesas@...der.be, tony@...mide.com,
        linus.walleij@...aro.org, sebastian.reichel@...labora.com,
        nick.hawkins@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, vschneid@...hat.com, dhildenb@...hat.com,
        alougovs@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm/mmu_gather: send tlb_remove_table_smp_sync IPI
 only to CPUs in kernel mode

On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 01:10:07PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 12:44:04PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 04:42:24PM +0300, Yair Podemsky wrote:
> > > +	int state = atomic_read(&ct->state);
> > > +	/* will return true only for cpus in kernel space */
> > > +	return state & CT_STATE_MASK == CONTEXT_KERNEL;
> > > +}
> > 
> > Also note that this doesn't stricly prevent userspace from being interrupted.
> > You may well observe the CPU in kernel but it may receive the IPI later after
> > switching to userspace.
> > 
> > We could arrange for avoiding that with marking ct->state with a pending work bit
> > to flush upon user entry/exit but that's a bit more overhead so I first need to
> > know about your expectations here, ie: can you tolerate such an occasional
> > interruption or not?
> 
> Bah, actually what can we do to prevent from that racy IPI? Not much I fear...

Use a different mechanism other than an IPI to ensure in progress
__get_free_pages_fast() has finished execution.

Isnt this codepath slow path enough that it can use
synchronize_rcu_expedited?