[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f1a32d5a-03e7-fce1-f5a5-6095f365f0a9@linux.dev>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2023 13:11:04 -0700
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
To: Kal Cutter Conley <kal.conley@...tris.com>
Cc: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...il.com>,
Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>,
Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>,
Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@...lanox.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] xsk: Fix unaligned descriptor validation
On 4/5/23 12:48 PM, Kal Cutter Conley wrote:
>> Is this case covered by an existing test?
>>
>
> No. I submitted a test but I was asked to make minor changes to it. I
> plan to submit the test once this gets picked up on bpf-next.
Since you already have a test case, it is better to submit them together such
that this case can be covered earlier than later.
Other xskxceiver fixes have already landed to bpf-next. imo, I think for this
particular case, bpf-next for both the fix and the test is fine.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists