lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 5 Apr 2023 12:43:03 +0800
From:   Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
To:     Pavankumar Kondeti <quic_pkondeti@...cinc.com>
CC:     "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, "Len Brown" <len.brown@...el.com>,
        Ye Bin <yebin10@...wei.com>,
        Nikhil V <quic_nprakash@...cinc.com>,
        <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM: hibernate: Get test_resume hibernation mode working
 again

Hi Pavankumar,
On 2023-04-05 at 09:15:02 +0530, Pavankumar Kondeti wrote:
> Commit 39fbef4b0f77 ("PM: hibernate: Get block device exclusively in
> swsusp_check()") changed the opening mode of the block device to
> (FMODE_READ | FMODE_EXCL) during resume. This breaks the test_resume
> hibernation mode as the block device is not available for exclusive
> open. Because the block device is configured as swap during hibernation.
> 
> Fix this issue by opening the device in FMODE_READ only in test_resume
> restore path. Cache the flags used in opening the block device so that
> callers of swsusp_close() does not need to worry about test_resume vs
> normal restore.
> 
> Fixes: 39fbef4b0f77 ("PM: hibernate: Get block device exclusively in swsusp_check()")
> Signed-off-by: Pavankumar Kondeti <quic_pkondeti@...cinc.com>
> ---
>  kernel/power/hibernate.c | 21 +++++++++++-----
>  kernel/power/power.h     |  4 +--
>  kernel/power/swap.c      | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
Thanks for taking a look at this, would the following fix make sense?
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230401165540.322665-1-yu.c.chen@intel.com/

thanks,
Chenyu

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ