linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 00/15] Rust pin-init API for pinned initialization of structs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 05 Apr 2023 21:06:46 +0000
From:   Benno Lossin <y86-dev@...tonmail.com>
To:     Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Cc:     Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
        Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
        Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>,
        Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
        Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
        Alice Ryhl <alice@...l.io>,
        Andreas Hindborg <nmi@...aspace.dk>,
        rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        patches@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/15] Rust pin-init API for pinned initialization of structs

On 05.04.23 23:02, Boqun Feng wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 07:35:30PM +0000, Benno Lossin wrote:
>> Changelog:
>> v5 -> v6:
>> - Change `pinned_drop` macro to allow `mut self` in the signature.
>> - Change statement fragment to tt fragemnt in `pinned_drop` to prevent
>>    parsing errors.
>> - Move evaluation of the value in `stack_pin_init!`/`stack_try_pin_init!`
>>    to the beginning.
>
> Could you elaborate why? To make sure the $val evaluation happens
> unconditionally?

This is done to allow `stack_pin_init!(let value = value);` i.e. naming
the variable the same as the expression that is evaluated.

--
Cheers,
Benno

>> - Move setting uninitialized flag in front of dropping the value in
>>    `StackInit::init`.
>> - Remove `Unpin` requirement on `zeroed()`.
>> - Add note about `Pointee` to the `Zeroable` impl on raw pointers.
>>
>
> Regards,
> Boqun