linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 3/9] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,qmp-pcie: Add ipq9574 bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 5 Apr 2023 12:19:09 +0530
From:   Devi Priya <quic_devipriy@...cinc.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        <agross@...nel.org>, <andersson@...nel.org>,
        <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
        <kw@...ux.com>, <robh@...nel.org>, <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        <kishon@...nel.org>, <mturquette@...libre.com>, <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        <mani@...nel.org>, <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <quic_srichara@...cinc.com>, <quic_gokulsri@...cinc.com>,
        <quic_sjaganat@...cinc.com>, <quic_kathirav@...cinc.com>,
        <quic_arajkuma@...cinc.com>, <quic_anusha@...cinc.com>,
        <quic_ipkumar@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/9] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,qmp-pcie: Add ipq9574
 bindings



On 4/5/2023 12:16 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 04/04/2023 18:48, Devi Priya wrote:
>> Add bindings for the PCIe QMP PHYs found on IPQ9574
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Devi Priya <quic_devipriy@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>>   Changes in V2:
>> 	- Added the ipq9574 bindings here as the phy nodes in the DT
>> 	  are modified to follow the latest style (without child node)
>>
> 
> The amount of changes and optionality of few properties suggests this
> should be new binding.
Sure, got it. Will add a newer binding for ipq9574 in next spin
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 
Thanks,
Devi Priya