[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZC04J30xQTVPJ1ho@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2023 11:58:15 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Olliver Schinagl <oliver@...inagl.nl>
Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@...il.com>,
Michael Jamet <michael.jamet@...el.com>,
Yehezkel Bernat <YehezkelShB@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] iopoll: Introduce ioreadXX_poll_timeout() macros
On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 10:12:31AM +0200, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
> On 30-03-2023 16:14, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
...
> But I actually have a small addendum for this series, as it will break
> `drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_dpmaif.c` due to a redefinition (yeah I know).
>
> So I have:
> https://gitlab.com/olliver/linux/-/commit/c9e591f2dabb2dbaeceebee61fa70b70fdbffc2a
> https://gitlab.com/olliver/linux/-/commit/41e0f8c08a1c55940813a240215910336ad7bec2
> https://gitlab.com/olliver/linux/-/commit/f36562f09b0185d403415864ef7218b46a742cdc
> https://gitlab.com/olliver/linux/-/commit/66237fd97bc42d272602b01dc0cca541c619b2be
>
> Which actually replaces silly calls like readx_poll_timeout(ioread32, ... .
>
> Do you want me to (re-?)post this as a series? I can put your thunderbolt
> (and your changes here) and post as one big series (or you can do the same
> obviously).
I believe the best course of action is to collect this series and your fix
in your hands and send it as a material for Linux WWAN subsystem with Mika's
Ack (if he has no objections). That said, let's wait for Mika's answer
on this.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists