[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b9c35799-7abf-116a-d0f4-531d1d3cd7b2@baylibre.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2023 11:26:30 +0200
From: Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@...libre.com>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, thierry.reding@...il.com
Cc: u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
weiqing.kong@...iatek.com, jitao.shi@...iatek.com,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...labora.com, wenst@...omium.org,
Nícolas F . R . A . Prado
<nfraprado@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/2] pwm: mtk-disp: Disable shadow registers before
setting backlight values
On 03/04/2023 15:30, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> If shadow registers usage is not desired, disable that before performing
> any write to CON0/1 registers in the .apply() callback, otherwise we may
> lose clkdiv or period/width updates.
>
> Fixes: cd4b45ac449a ("pwm: Add MediaTek MT2701 display PWM driver support")
> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
> Reviewed-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@...labora.com>
> Tested-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@...labora.com>
> ---
> drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c
> index 692a06121b28..82b430d881a2 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c
> @@ -138,6 +138,19 @@ static int mtk_disp_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> high_width = mul_u64_u64_div_u64(state->duty_cycle, rate, div);
> value = period | (high_width << PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_SHIFT);
>
> + if (mdp->data->bls_debug && !mdp->data->has_commit) {
> + /*
> + * For MT2701, disable double buffer before writing register
> + * and select manual mode and use PWM_PERIOD/PWM_HIGH_WIDTH.
> + */
> + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, mdp->data->bls_debug,
> + mdp->data->bls_debug_mask,
> + mdp->data->bls_debug_mask);
> + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, mdp->data->con0,
> + mdp->data->con0_sel,
> + mdp->data->con0_sel);
> + }
> +
> mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, mdp->data->con0,
> PWM_CLKDIV_MASK,
> clk_div << PWM_CLKDIV_SHIFT);
> @@ -152,17 +165,6 @@ static int mtk_disp_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, mdp->data->commit,
> mdp->data->commit_mask,
> 0x0);
> - } else {
> - /*
> - * For MT2701, disable double buffer before writing register
> - * and select manual mode and use PWM_PERIOD/PWM_HIGH_WIDTH.
> - */
> - mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, mdp->data->bls_debug,
> - mdp->data->bls_debug_mask,
> - mdp->data->bls_debug_mask);
> - mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, mdp->data->con0,
> - mdp->data->con0_sel,
> - mdp->data->con0_sel);
> }
>
> mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_EN, mdp->data->enable_mask,
Hi,
I've made a non-regression test for the mt8365-evk (i350-evk) board.
It's fine for me.
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@...libre.com>
Tested-by: Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@...libre.com>
Regards,
Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists