linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 6/8] RISC-V: KVM: Add ONE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 5 Apr 2023 10:28:03 +0100
From:   Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
To:     Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
CC:     Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
        Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, <kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <bjorn@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/8] RISC-V: KVM: Add ONE_REG interface for AIA CSRs

On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 12:58:41PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 01:52:43PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 02:23:01PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> 
> > > It's probably best if neither depend on each other, since they're
> > > independent, but otherwise the order doesn't matter. It'd be nice to call
> > > the order out in the cover letter to give patchwork a chance at automatic
> > > build testing, though. To call it out, I believe adding
> > > 
> > > Based-on: 20230401112730.2105240-1-apatel@...tanamicro.com
> > > 
> > > to the cover letter should work.
> > 
> > I also just noticed that this based on "RISC-V: KVM: Add ONE_REG
> > interface to enable/disable SBI extensions"[1] and it needs to be
> > in order to pick up the KVM_REG_RISCV_SUBTYPE_MASK and
> > KVM_REG_RISCV_SUBTYPE_SHIFT defines. It'd be good to call that
> > patch out with Based-on.
> > 
> > [1]: 20230331174542.2067560-2-apatel@...tanamicro.com
> 
> I've been waiting for a review on that for a while.. It's been 3
> weeks, so just gonna merge it and see what breaks!

I did in fact break some stuff, but the output was no worse than if the
dependencies had not been specified...
I've fixed it (I think!) and told it to ignore the old state, so it'll
re-run against the stuff it missed.

Cheers,
Conor.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)