linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/104] 5.4.240-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2023040516-flirt-provolone-d254@gregkh>
Date:   Wed, 5 Apr 2023 11:33:35 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Tom Saeger <tom.saeger@...cle.com>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/104] 5.4.240-rc1 review

On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 02:33:12PM -0600, Tom Saeger wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 04:07:52PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.240 release.
> > There are 104 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 05 Apr 2023 14:03:18 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.240-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> > 
> 
> Hey Greg,
> 
> This still reproduces:
> 
> 
> cp arch/mips/configs/lasat_defconfig .config
> make ARCH=mips olddefconfig
> make ARCH=mips
> 
> 
> .../linux-stable-5.4/arch/mips/lasat/picvue_proc.c:42:44: error: expected ')' before '&' token
>    42 | static DECLARE_TASKLET(pvc_display_tasklet, &pvc_display, 0);
>       |                                            ^~
>       |                                            )
> .../linux-stable-5.4/arch/mips/lasat/picvue_proc.c: In function 'pvc_line_proc_write':
> .../linux-stable-5.4/arch/mips/lasat/picvue_proc.c:87:20: error: 'pvc_display_tasklet' undeclared (first use in this function)
>    87 |  tasklet_schedule(&pvc_display_tasklet);
>       |                    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> .../linux-stable-5.4/arch/mips/lasat/picvue_proc.c:87:20: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> At top level:
> .../linux-stable-5.4/arch/mips/lasat/picvue_proc.c:33:13: error: 'pvc_display' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
>    33 | static void pvc_display(unsigned long data)
>       |             ^~~~~~~~~~~
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> 
> Attached is mbox of fixed-up revert/backports.

Odd that no one else is reporting this.  Thanks for the patches, I've
queued them up for the next 5.4.y release.

greg k-h