[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230405093945.3549491-1-michael.wei.hong.sit@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2023 17:39:45 +0800
From: Michael Sit Wei Hong <michael.wei.hong.sit@...el.com>
To: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Ong Boon Leong <boon.leong.ong@...el.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux@...linux.org.uk, hkallweit1@...il.com, andrew@...n.ch,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
Shahab Vahedi <Shahab.Vahedi@...opsys.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Cc: Looi Hong Aun <hong.aun.looi@...el.com>,
Voon Weifeng <weifeng.voon@...el.com>,
Lai Peter Jun Ann <peter.jun.ann.lai@...el.com>,
Zulkifli Muhammad Husaini <muhammad.husaini.zulkifli@...el.com>,
Tan Tee Min <tee.min.tan@...el.com>,
hock.leong.kweh@...el.com
Subject: [PATCH net 1/1] net: stmmac: check fwnode for phy device before scanning for phy
Some DT devices already have phy device configured in the DT/ACPI.
Current implementation scans for a phy unconditionally even though
there is a phy listed in the DT/ACPI and already attached.
We should check the fwnode if there is any phy device listed in
fwnode and decide whether to scan for a phy to attach to.y
Reported-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
Fixes: fe2cfbc96803 ("net: stmmac: check if MAC needs to attach to a PHY")
Signed-off-by: Michael Sit Wei Hong <michael.wei.hong.sit@...el.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c | 15 +++++++++++----
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
index d41a5f92aee7..7ca9be7bec06 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
@@ -1134,22 +1134,26 @@ static void stmmac_check_pcs_mode(struct stmmac_priv *priv)
static int stmmac_init_phy(struct net_device *dev)
{
struct stmmac_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
+ struct fwnode_handle *phy_fwnode;
struct fwnode_handle *fwnode;
- bool phy_needed;
int ret;
+ if (!phylink_expects_phy(priv->phylink))
+ return 0;
+
fwnode = of_fwnode_handle(priv->plat->phylink_node);
if (!fwnode)
fwnode = dev_fwnode(priv->device);
if (fwnode)
- ret = phylink_fwnode_phy_connect(priv->phylink, fwnode, 0);
+ phy_fwnode = fwnode_get_phy_node(fwnode);
+ else
+ phy_fwnode = NULL;
- phy_needed = phylink_expects_phy(priv->phylink);
/* Some DT bindings do not set-up the PHY handle. Let's try to
* manually parse it
*/
- if (!fwnode || phy_needed || ret) {
+ if (!phy_fwnode || IS_ERR(phy_fwnode)) {
int addr = priv->plat->phy_addr;
struct phy_device *phydev;
@@ -1165,6 +1169,9 @@ static int stmmac_init_phy(struct net_device *dev)
}
ret = phylink_connect_phy(priv->phylink, phydev);
+ } else {
+ fwnode_handle_put(phy_fwnode);
+ ret = phylink_fwnode_phy_connect(priv->phylink, fwnode, 0);
}
if (!priv->plat->pmt) {
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists