lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 5 Apr 2023 11:43:49 +0200
From:   Tobias Klauser <tklauser@...tanz.ch>
To:     Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Cc:     Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] selftests/clone3: fix number of tests in ksft_set_plan

On 2023-04-05 at 09:46:11 +0200, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 10:57:37PM +0200, Tobias Klauser wrote:
> > On 2023-03-14 at 14:09:59 +0100, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 01:34:14PM +0100, Tobias Klauser wrote:
> > > > Commit 515bddf0ec41 ("selftests/clone3: test clone3 with CLONE_NEWTIME")
> > > > added an additional test, so the number passed to ksft_set_plan needs to
> > > > be bumped accordingly.
> > > > 
> > > > Also use ksft_finished() to print results and exit. This will catch future
> > > > mismatches between ksft_set_plan() and the number of tests being run.
> > > > 
> > > > Fixes: 515bddf0ec41 ("selftests/clone3: test clone3 with CLONE_NEWTIME")
> > > > Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@...tanz.ch>
> > > > ---
> > > 
> > > Looks good. Thanks for fixing this,
> > > Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
> > > 
> > > Feel free to take this through the selftests tree, Shuah.
> > 
> > It looks like this hasn't made it into Linus' tree yet and I also don't
> > see it in Shuah's tree. Would it be possible to still submit this for
> > 6.3-rc6 given the commit it fixes has made it to Linus' tree already?
> 
> Is it in linux-next?

No, doesn't look like it (I checked on tags/next-20230405).

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ