linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Some fixes and cleanup for maple tree.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 5 Apr 2023 17:53:44 +0800
From:   Peng Zhang <zhangpeng.00@...edance.com>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, maple-tree@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Some fixes and cleanup for maple tree.


在 2023/4/5 04:27, Andrew Morton 写道:

> On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 20:42:00 +0800 Peng Zhang <zhangpeng.00@...edance.com> wrote:
>
>> Some fixes and clean up for maple tree.
>>
>> The bug fixed by [PATCH v2 1/3] does not seem to be triggered due to some
>> coincidences, because now the implementation of mtree_lookup_walk() scans
>> pivots one by one and exits the loop early. The test cases for the bugs fixed by
>> [PATCH v2 3/3] are difficult to write. If I think of how to write them later,
>> I will send them out. So I send out the second edition first.
> Do we feel that any of these should be backported into -stable kernels?
> [3/3] looks to be a candidate for this?

Both [1/3] and [3/3] can be sent to the stable kernel, do I need to do anything?