[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZC1K5mLAkkO7bjA4@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2023 11:18:14 +0100
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Michael Sit Wei Hong <michael.wei.hong.sit@...el.com>
Cc: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Ong Boon Leong <boon.leong.ong@...el.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
hkallweit1@...il.com, andrew@...n.ch,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
Shahab Vahedi <Shahab.Vahedi@...opsys.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Looi Hong Aun <hong.aun.looi@...el.com>,
Voon Weifeng <weifeng.voon@...el.com>,
Lai Peter Jun Ann <peter.jun.ann.lai@...el.com>,
Zulkifli Muhammad Husaini <muhammad.husaini.zulkifli@...el.com>,
Tan Tee Min <tee.min.tan@...el.com>,
hock.leong.kweh@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/1] net: stmmac: check fwnode for phy device before
scanning for phy
On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 05:39:45PM +0800, Michael Sit Wei Hong wrote:
> Some DT devices already have phy device configured in the DT/ACPI.
> Current implementation scans for a phy unconditionally even though
> there is a phy listed in the DT/ACPI and already attached.
>
> We should check the fwnode if there is any phy device listed in
> fwnode and decide whether to scan for a phy to attach to.y
>
> Reported-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
Suggested-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
> Fixes: fe2cfbc96803 ("net: stmmac: check if MAC needs to attach to a PHY")
> Signed-off-by: Michael Sit Wei Hong <michael.wei.hong.sit@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c | 15 +++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> index d41a5f92aee7..7ca9be7bec06 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> @@ -1134,22 +1134,26 @@ static void stmmac_check_pcs_mode(struct stmmac_priv *priv)
> static int stmmac_init_phy(struct net_device *dev)
> {
> struct stmmac_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> + struct fwnode_handle *phy_fwnode;
> struct fwnode_handle *fwnode;
> - bool phy_needed;
> int ret;
>
> + if (!phylink_expects_phy(priv->phylink))
> + return 0;
> +
> fwnode = of_fwnode_handle(priv->plat->phylink_node);
> if (!fwnode)
> fwnode = dev_fwnode(priv->device);
>
> if (fwnode)
> - ret = phylink_fwnode_phy_connect(priv->phylink, fwnode, 0);
> + phy_fwnode = fwnode_get_phy_node(fwnode);
> + else
> + phy_fwnode = NULL;
>
> - phy_needed = phylink_expects_phy(priv->phylink);
> /* Some DT bindings do not set-up the PHY handle. Let's try to
> * manually parse it
> */
> - if (!fwnode || phy_needed || ret) {
> + if (!phy_fwnode || IS_ERR(phy_fwnode)) {
> int addr = priv->plat->phy_addr;
> struct phy_device *phydev;
>
> @@ -1165,6 +1169,9 @@ static int stmmac_init_phy(struct net_device *dev)
> }
>
> ret = phylink_connect_phy(priv->phylink, phydev);
> + } else {
> + fwnode_handle_put(phy_fwnode);
> + ret = phylink_fwnode_phy_connect(priv->phylink, fwnode, 0);
> }
>
> if (!priv->plat->pmt) {
LGTM, thanks for taking on board my suggestion.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists