[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230405114807.5a57bf46@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2023 11:48:07 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Bastien Nocera <hadess@...ess.net>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the hid tree
Hi Bastien,
On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 11:18:35 +0200 Bastien Nocera <hadess@...ess.net> wrote:
>
> Before I send patches, does this look correct to you?
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/message.c b/drivers/usb/core/message.c
> index 7930dca84616..7c7f88ca4f62 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/core/message.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/message.c
> @@ -1926,7 +1926,7 @@ static void __usb_wireless_status_intf(struct work_struct *ws)
> 1926⋮1926│
> 1927⋮1927│ /**
> 1928⋮1928│ * usb_set_wireless_status - sets the wireless_status struct member
> 1929⋮ │- * @dev: the device to modify
> ⋮1929│+ * @iface: the interface to modify
> 1930⋮1930│ * @status: the new wireless status
> 1931⋮1931│ *
> 1932⋮1932│ * Set the wireless_status struct member to the new value, and emit
That looks good.
> diff --git a/include/linux/usb.h b/include/linux/usb.h
> index a48eeec62a66..3d523ebf0c09 100644
> --- a/include/linux/usb.h
> +++ b/include/linux/usb.h
> @@ -261,7 +261,8 @@ struct usb_interface {
> 261⋮ 261│ unsigned needs_binding:1; /* needs delayed unbind/rebind */
> 262⋮ 262│ unsigned resetting_device:1; /* true: bandwidth alloc after reset */
> 263⋮ 263│ unsigned authorized:1; /* used for interface authorization */
> 264⋮ │- enum usb_wireless_status wireless_status;
> ⋮ 264│+ enum usb_wireless_status wireless_status; /* whether the emitter is
> ⋮ 265│+ * connected to this receiver */
> 265⋮ 266│ struct work_struct wireless_status_work;
> 266⋮ 267│
> 267⋮ 268│ struct device dev; /* interface specific device info */
>
This is not right, though. The warning was about
"wireless_status_work" not "wireless_status", so I think you need a
description of wireless_status_work in the block comment above the
struct definition.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists