[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bbae9e35f2bf4cbcbc78f852041e4b2e@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2023 11:21:33 +0000
From: "Ding, Shenghao" <shenghao-ding@...com>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
Amadeusz Slawinski <amadeuszx.slawinski@...ux.intel.com>
CC: "Lu, Kevin" <kevin-lu@...com>,
"alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Xu, Baojun" <x1077012@...com>, "Gupta, Peeyush" <peeyush@...com>,
"Navada Kanyana, Mukund" <navada@...com>,
"Shenghao Ding" <13916275206@....com>,
"broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
"lgirdwood@...il.com" <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
"perex@...ex.cz" <perex@...ex.cz>,
"pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com"
<pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH v10] ASoC: tas2781: Add tas2781 driver
Hi Both
I wrote a test code to verify the be32_to_cpu & be32_to_cpup,
static int __init lkm_init(void)
{
char test_buf[]={0x12, 0x34, 0xab, 0xbc, 0x56, 0x78, 0xef};
unsigned int *k, p, q;
int i;
printk("Hello, Shanghai!\n");
for (i = 0; i < 4; i ++) {
k = (unsigned int *)&test_buf[i];
p = be32_to_cpup((__be32 *)k);
q = be32_to_cpu(test_buf[i]);
printk("%d: *k = 0x%08x p = 0x%08x q = 0x%08x %ld\n",
i, *k, p, q, sizeof(unsigned int));
}
return 0;
}
The output is:
[ 9109.722548] Hello, Shanghai!
[ 9109.726287] 0: *k = 0xbcab3412 p = 0x1234abbc q = 0x12000000 4
[ 9109.727665] 1: *k = 0x56bcab34 p = 0x34abbc56 q = 0x34000000 4
[ 9109.728553] 2: *k = 0x7856bcab p = 0xabbc5678 q = 0xabffffff 4
[ 9109.729308] 3: *k = 0xef7856bc p = 0xbc5678ef q = 0xbcffffff 4
Apparently, be32_to_cpup's output is what I expected.
Looking forward to your comments. Thanks.
BR
Shenghao Ding
-----Original Message-----
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Sent: Saturday, April 1, 2023 4:41 AM
To: Ding, Shenghao <shenghao-ding@...com>; Amadeusz Slawinski <amadeuszx.slawinski@...ux.intel.com>; Shenghao Ding <13916275206@....com>; broonie@...nel.org; lgirdwood@...il.com; perex@...ex.cz; pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com
Cc: Lu, Kevin <kevin-lu@...com>; alsa-devel@...a-project.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Xu, Baojun <x1077012@...com>; Gupta, Peeyush <peeyush@...com>; Navada Kanyana, Mukund <navada@...com>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH v10] ASoC: tas2781: Add tas2781 driver
Le 31/03/2023 à 04:19, Ding, Shenghao a écrit :
> Hi Amadeusz Sławiński
> Thanks for your comment.
> Answer inline.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Amadeusz Sławiński <amadeuszx.slawinski@...ux.intel.com>
> Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2023 7:54 PM
> To: Shenghao Ding <13916275206@....com>; broonie@...nel.org;
> lgirdwood@...il.com; perex@...ex.cz;
> pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com
> Cc: Lu, Kevin <kevin-lu@...com>; Ding, Shenghao
> <shenghao-ding@...com>; alsa-devel@...a-project.org;
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Xu, Baojun <x1077012@...com>; Gupta,
> Peeyush <peeyush@...com>; Navada Kanyana, Mukund <navada@...com>
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH v10] ASoC: tas2781: Add tas2781 driver
>
> On 3/29/2023 12:01 PM, Shenghao Ding wrote:
>> Create tas2781 driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shenghao Ding <13916275206@....com>
>>
>> ---
>> Changes in v10:
>> - using be16_to_cpu and be32_to_cpu instead of SMS_HTONS and SMS_HTONL
>> - optimize and reduce the boundary checks
>> - Add comments on some kmemdup instead of kzalloc+memcpy
>> Changes to be committed:
>> modified: sound/soc/codecs/Kconfig
>> modified: sound/soc/codecs/Makefile
>> new file: sound/soc/codecs/tas2781-dsp.c
>> new file: sound/soc/codecs/tas2781-dsp.h
>> new file: sound/soc/codecs/tas2781-i2c.c
>> new file: sound/soc/codecs/tas2781.h
>> ---
>
> ...
>
>> +
>> +static int fw_parse_block_data_kernel(struct tasdevice_fw *tas_fmw,
>> + struct tasdev_blk *block, const struct firmware *fmw, int offset) {
>> + const unsigned char *data = fmw->data;
>> +
>> + if (offset + 16 > fmw->size) {
>> + dev_err(tas_fmw->dev, "%s: File Size error\n", __func__);
>> + offset = -EINVAL;
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> + block->type = be32_to_cpup((__be32 *)&data[offset]);
>
> Wouldn't just be32_to_cpu(data[offset]) work instead of be32_to_cpup?
> Same in other cases.
> [DING] data[] is a char array, the code will convert data[offset],
> data[offset + 1], data[offset + 2] and data[offset + 3] into host instead of data[offset] only.
>
Not sure to follow you.
Isn't it the purpose of be32_to_cpu() to take a 32 bits word, in other words 4 x 8 bits char, and swap what if needed (little endian arch)?
It ends to __swab32() ([1] for the "constant" implementation)
be32_to_cpup(&p) ends to __swab32(*p), which really looks to the same as be32_to_cpu(p).
Can you elaborate more?
CJ
[1]:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.3-rc3/source/include/uapi/linux/swab.h#L18
Powered by blists - more mailing lists