[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230405142840.11068-1-vbabka@suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2023 16:28:40 +0200
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
patches@...ts.linux.dev, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Halbuer <halbuer@....uni-hannover.de>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH] mm, page_alloc: use check_pages_enabled static key to check tail pages
Commit 700d2e9a36b9 ("mm, page_alloc: reduce page alloc/free sanity
checks") has introduced a new static key check_pages_enabled to control
when struct pages are sanity checked during allocation and freeing. Mel
Gorman suggested that free_tail_pages_check() could use this static key
as well, instead of relying on CONFIG_DEBUG_VM. That makes sense, so do
that. Also rename the function to free_tail_page_prepare() because it
works on a single tail page and has a struct page preparation component
as well as the optional checking component.
Also remove some unnecessary unlikely() within static_branch_unlikely()
statements that Mel pointed out for commit 700d2e9a36b9.
Suggested-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
---
mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c | 2 +-
mm/page_alloc.c | 10 +++++-----
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c b/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c
index a15cc56cf70a..656b00d1a2fb 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c
@@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ static void vmemmap_remap_pte(pte_t *pte, unsigned long addr,
* How many struct page structs need to be reset. When we reuse the head
* struct page, the special metadata (e.g. page->flags or page->mapping)
* cannot copy to the tail struct page structs. The invalid value will be
- * checked in the free_tail_pages_check(). In order to avoid the message
+ * checked in the free_tail_page_prepare(). In order to avoid the message
* of "corrupted mapping in tail page". We need to reset at least 3 (one
* head struct page struct and two tail struct page structs) struct page
* structs.
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index a109444e9f44..7df5bf07e013 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -1308,7 +1308,7 @@ static inline bool free_page_is_bad(struct page *page)
return true;
}
-static int free_tail_pages_check(struct page *head_page, struct page *page)
+static int free_tail_page_prepare(struct page *head_page, struct page *page)
{
struct folio *folio = (struct folio *)head_page;
int ret = 1;
@@ -1319,7 +1319,7 @@ static int free_tail_pages_check(struct page *head_page, struct page *page)
*/
BUILD_BUG_ON((unsigned long)LIST_POISON1 & 1);
- if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_VM)) {
+ if (!static_branch_unlikely(&check_pages_enabled)) {
ret = 0;
goto out;
}
@@ -1447,9 +1447,9 @@ static __always_inline bool free_pages_prepare(struct page *page,
ClearPageHasHWPoisoned(page);
for (i = 1; i < (1 << order); i++) {
if (compound)
- bad += free_tail_pages_check(page, page + i);
+ bad += free_tail_page_prepare(page, page + i);
if (static_branch_unlikely(&check_pages_enabled)) {
- if (unlikely(free_page_is_bad(page + i))) {
+ if (free_page_is_bad(page + i)) {
bad++;
continue;
}
@@ -2375,7 +2375,7 @@ static inline bool check_new_pages(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
for (int i = 0; i < (1 << order); i++) {
struct page *p = page + i;
- if (unlikely(check_new_page(p)))
+ if (check_new_page(p))
return true;
}
}
--
2.40.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists