[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZC2JrJwKM3KrgNgm@google.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2023 07:46:04 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Hao Ge <gehao@...inos.cn>
Cc: pbonzini@...hat.com, shuah@...nel.org, dmatlack@...gle.com,
coltonlewis@...gle.com, vipinsh@...gle.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
gehao618@....com
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] kvm/selftests: Close opened file descriptor in stable_tsc_check_supported()
This is not a RESEND, it is a new version. From Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst:
Don't add "RESEND" when you are submitting a modified version of your
patch or patch series - "RESEND" only applies to resubmission of a
patch or patch series which have not been modified in any way from the
previous submission.
And the "in any way" really does mean in _any_ way. E.g. if a patch is rebased,
the version needs to be bumped. RESEND should only ever be used when sending
literally the same patch/email file, e.g. if something went awry in the delivery
of the email, or you forgot to Cc the right people, tec.
On Wed, Apr 05, 2023, Hao Ge wrote:
> Close the "current_clocksource" file descriptor before
Wrap closer to ~75 chars, wrapping at ~55 is too aggressive.
> returning or exiting from stable_tsc_check_supported()
> in vmx_nested_tsc_scaling_test
Vipin provided his Reviewed-by, that should have been captured here. Please read
through Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst, guidance on "using" the
various tags is also provided there. And if you have time, pretty much all of
Documentation/process/ is worth reading.
No need to send a new version, all of this is easy to fixup when applying.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists