[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZC2nbiarELlUVcSj@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2023 09:53:02 -0700
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: david@...hat.com, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-modules@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pmladek@...e.com,
petr.pavlu@...e.com, prarit@...hat.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
rafael@...nel.org, christophe.leroy@...roup.eu, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, song@...nel.org, rppt@...nel.org,
dave@...olabs.net, willy@...radead.org, vbabka@...e.cz,
mhocko@...e.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
colin.i.king@...il.com, jim.cromie@...il.com,
catalin.marinas@....com, jbaron@...mai.com,
rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] debugfs: add debugfs_create_atomic64_t for
atomic64_t
On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 09:23:09AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 5, 2023 at 9:11 AM Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Oh but I don't get the atomic incs, so we'd need debugfs_create_atomic_long_t().
>
> debugfs_create_ulong("total_mod_size",
> 0400, mod_debugfs_root,
> &total_mod_size.counter);
>
> but I didn't actually try to compile that kind of version.
>
> (I think "counter" is actually a _signed_ long, so maybe the types don't match).
I see yes, sadly we'd have to cast to (unsigned long *) to make that
work as atomic_long counters are long long int:
debugfs_create_ulong("total_mod_size",
0400, mod_debugfs_root,
- &total_mod_size.counter);
+ (unsigned long *)&total_mod_size.counter);
That's:
unsigned long min bits 32
long long min bits 64
But since we'd be doing our accounting in atomic_long and just use
debugfs for prints I think that's fine. Just a bit ugly.
Luis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists