[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6e74d3f5-b792-7576-2340-fb4d67490a6b@kylinos.cn>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 10:01:33 +0800
From: Feng Jiang <jiangfeng@...inos.cn>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
shuah@...nel.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ming Xie <xieming@...inos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/mm: fix memory leak in child_memcmp_fn
On 2023/4/4 15:31, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 04.04.23 05:12, Feng Jiang wrote:
>> The allocated memory should be freed on return.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Feng Jiang <jiangfeng@...inos.cn>
>> Suggested-by: Ming Xie <xieming@...inos.cn>
>> ---
>> tools/testing/selftests/mm/cow.c | 9 ++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/cow.c
>> b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/cow.c
>> index 0eb2e8180aa5..c0dd2dfca51b 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/cow.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/cow.c
>> @@ -162,6 +162,10 @@ static int child_memcmp_fn(char *mem, size_t size,
>> {
>> char *old = malloc(size);
>> char buf;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + if (!old)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> /* Backup the original content. */
>> memcpy(old, mem, size);
>> @@ -172,7 +176,10 @@ static int child_memcmp_fn(char *mem, size_t size,
>> ;
>> /* See if we still read the old values. */
>> - return memcmp(old, mem, size);
>> + ret = memcmp(old, mem, size);
>> + free(old);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> }
>> static int child_vmsplice_memcmp_fn(char *mem, size_t size,
>
> NAK, the whole point of this function is that the child process will
> exit immediately after executing this function, cleaning up
> automatically.
>
Hi David, thanks very much for your review and I think you are right.
While the OS provides a cleanup mechanism to underwrite this, I think it
makes sense for the application to ensure that its own logic is complete
and correct.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists