linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: omap: Convert omap.txt to yaml

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230406203548.152ae065@aktux>
Date:   Thu, 6 Apr 2023 20:35:48 +0200
From:   Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc:     robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
        tony@...mide.com, afd@...com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: omap: Convert omap.txt to yaml

On Thu, 6 Apr 2023 10:36:36 +0200
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:

> On 06/04/2023 10:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 05/04/2023 18:19, Andreas Kemnade wrote:  
> >> From: Andrew Davis <afd@...com>
> >>
> >> Convert omap.txt to yaml.
> >>  
> > 
> >   
> >> +      - description: TI AM43 SoC based platforms
> >> +        items:
> >> +          - enum:
> >> +              - compulab,am437x-cm-t43
> >> +              - ti,am437x-gp-evm
> >> +              - ti,am437x-idk-evm
> >> +              - ti,am437x-sk-evm
> >> +          - pattern: '^ti,am4372[26789]$'
> >> +          - const: ti,am43
> >> +
> >> +      - description: TI AM57 SoC based platforms
> >> +        items:
> >> +          - enum:
> >> +              - beagle,am5729-beagleboneai
> >> +              - compulab,cl-som-am57x
> >> +              - ti,am5718-idk
> >> +              - ti,am5728-idk
> >> +              - ti,am5748-idk
> >> +          - pattern: '^ti,am57[0124][689]$'  
> > 
> > I don't think my comments were resolved. I asked if it is possible to
> > make a board called "ti,am5718-idk" with "ti,am5749" or with "ti,am5708"?  
> 
> Hm, I cannot find my concern, so maybe it never left my outbox. Anyway,
> it looks like you allow here many incorrect patterns and combinations.
> 
You had concerns about the "dra" stuff for the same valid reasons.

> > 
> > What's more, you dropped several variations and compatibles against
> > original binding (all the "dra") and it is not explained in commit msg
> > at all.  
> 
> All changes against original bindings should be explained.
> 
... which I then just decided not to convert but keep as is in the text file
because there were no comments hints about it more than a month since the first
version was sent so thought that it has to be resolved later.

Regards,
Andreas