[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2446486.yKVeVyVuyW@diego>
Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2023 20:40:53 +0200
From: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@...labora.com>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...labora.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH v2 0/2] Add PWM fan support to Rock 5B board
Am Donnerstag, 6. April 2023, 20:27:33 CEST schrieb Guenter Roeck:
> On 4/5/23 14:35, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 5. April 2023, 21:04:04 CEST schrieb Guenter Roeck:
> >> On 4/5/23 10:45, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 20:38:05 +0300, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
> >>>> This patch series enables support for the PWM controlled heat sink fan
> >>>> on the Rock 5B SBC and, additionally, converts the hwmon PWM fan bindings
> >>>> to DT schema format.
> >>>>
> >>>> Changes in v2:
> >>>> - Updated PATCH 1/2 according to Rob's review
> >>>> - Added Reviewed-by from Christopher to PATCH 2/2
> >>>> - v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230403105052.426135-1-cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com/
> >>>>
> >>>> [...]
> >>>
> >>> Applied, thanks!
> >>>
> >>
> >> Both patches or only the second one ?
> >
> > only the second one of course. According to earlier talks the dts patch
> > does already follow the text binding, so the yaml conversion is actually
> > not a requirement for it.
> >
> > So I picked the dts patch let the binding sort itself when people have
> > time for it :-) .
> >
> >
> > Looking at the mail b4 created, I guessed this would also be visible
> > with the subject saying (subset) and the listed commits only showing
> >
> > [2/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3588-rock-5b: Add pwm-fan
> > commit: f36bb17653e4b9e26bbdb1224027d20614e77636
> >
>
> Kind of, sure, but I figured it doesn't hurt asking to avoid the situation
> (again) where I apply a patch and then get a nice e-mail telling me that
> some other branch also applied the same patch.
no worries and yes better save than sorry.
Though you had me worried for a bit that somehow the mail b4 generated
for me was faulty ;-)
Heiko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists