[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9e98496b-73a0-78a5-e890-7d7e4be1f469@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 11:53:19 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@...il.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Cyril Brulebois <kibi@...ian.org>,
Phil Elwell <phil@...pberrypi.com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, james.quinlan@...adcom.com
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kw@...ux.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] dt-bindings: PCI: brcmstb: Add two optional props
On 4/6/23 11:34, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 06/04/2023 14:46, Jim Quinlan wrote:
>> Regarding "brcm,enable-l1ss":
>>
>> The Broadcom STB/CM PCIe HW -- which is also used by RPi SOCs -- requires
>> the driver probe to configure one of three clkreq# modes:
>>
>> (a) clkreq# driven by the RC
>> (b) clkreq# driven by the EP for ASPM L0s, L1
>> (c) bidirectional clkreq#, as used for L1 Substates (L1SS).
>>
>> The HW can tell the difference between (a) and (b), but does not know
>> when to configure (c). Further, the HW will cause a CPU abort on boot if
>> guesses wrong regarding the need for (c). So we introduce the boolean
>> "brcm,enable-l1ss" property to indicate that (c) is desired. This
>> property is already present in the Raspian version of Linux, but the
>> driver implementaion that will follow adds more details and discerns
>> between (a) and (b).
>>
>> Regarding "brcm,completion-timeout-msecs"
>>
>> Our HW will cause a CPU abort if the L1SS exit time is longer than the
>> completion abort timeout. We've been asked to make this configurable, so
>> we are introducing "brcm,completion-abort-msecs".
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@...il.com>
>> ---
>> .../devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml | 12 ++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml
>> index 7e15aae7d69e..ef4ccc05b258 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml
>> @@ -64,6 +64,18 @@ properties:
>>
>> aspm-no-l0s: true
>>
>> + brcm,enable-l1ss:
>> + description: Indicates that the downstream device is L1SS
>> + capable and L1SS is desired, e.g. by setting
>> + CONFIG_PCIEASPM_POWER_SUPERSAVE=y. Note that CLKREQ#
>
> How does CONFIG_PCIEASPM_POWER_SUPERSAVE apply to *BSD?
In other words, there should be no OS/Linux specific comments in a
Device Tree binding, which would be a friendlier and nicer way of
providing the same feedback.
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists