linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dt-bindings: cisco: document the CrayAR compatibles

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 6 Apr 2023 19:15:06 +0000
From:   "Daniel Walker (danielwa)" <danielwa@...co.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
CC:     "xe-linux-external(mailer list)" <xe-linux-external@...co.com>,
        "Marcin Wierzbicki -X (mawierzb - GLOBALLOGIC INC at Cisco)" 
        <mawierzb@...co.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dt-bindings: cisco: document the CrayAR
 compatibles

On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 08:56:06PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 06/04/2023 20:32, Daniel Walker (danielwa) wrote:
> >>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cisco/crayar.yaml
> >>>>
> >>>> How many (or not many) platforms do you expect from Cisco? We mostly
> >>>> have one file per SoC manufacturer.
> >>>
> >>> We have two SoC's one called CrayAR and another called Craw. I've submitted the
> >>> Craw dts file before , but I've not resubmitted it. Under Craw I think we have
> >>> at least two, but more likely five variations. CrayAR we have one variation with
> >>> at least one more planned.
> >>>
> >>> So we would plan over time to add two dtsi files and three to four dts files to
> >>> this directory. Then more over time.
> >>
> >> So just keep them in one file maybe.
> > 
> > If/when I submit again with anther chip we can discuss it at that time.
> 
> Or you can do it now.

What do you want to talk about exactly ? You said keep everything in one file, doesn't this
already fit your suggestion ? I'm only submitting one file.

What are you envisioning Cisco to do ?

Daniel