linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: mpm: Pass MSG RAM slice through phandle

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3ce9b5ec-8b02-537a-c663-c849e80cab66@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu, 6 Apr 2023 21:55:40 +0200
From:   Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
        Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: mpm: Pass MSG
 RAM slice through phandle



On 6.04.2023 19:45, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 05/04/2023 15:49, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 5.04.2023 15:47, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 07:22:40AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 05 Apr 2023 12:48:34 +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>>> Due to the wild nature of the Qualcomm RPM Message RAM, we can't really
>>>>> use 'reg' to point to the MPM's slice of Message RAM without cutting into
>>>>> an already-defined RPM MSG RAM node used for GLINK and SMEM.
>>>>>
>>>>> Document passing the register space as a slice of SRAM through the
>>>>> qcom,rpm-msg-ram property. This also makes 'reg' deprecated.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  .../devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/qcom,mpm.yaml   | 12 +++++++++---
>>>>>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
>>>> on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
>>>>
>>>> yamllint warnings/errors:
>>>>
>>>> dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/qcom,mpm.example.dts:22.35-38.11: Warning (node_name_vs_property_name): /example-0/interrupt-controller: node name and property name conflict
>>>
>>> Looks like this is colliding with the example template which has to 
>>> craft an interrupt provider for 'interrupts' properties. Either adding a 
>>> parent node or using interrupts-extended instead should work-around it.
>> Check the devicetree-org issue linked in the cover letter, please!
>>
>> I suppose wrapping it in a parent node could work as a temporary
>> measure, but since it belongs outside /soc, I'd have to make up
>> a bogus simple-bus, I think.
> 
> I don't think your issue in dtschema is accurate. As Rob suggested, you
> need wrapping node.
I don't really know what kind.. I can add something like:

rpm {
	compatible = "qcom,rpm", "simple-mfd";

	mpm: interrupt-controller {
	...
};

And then only introduce a very simple YAML for "qcom,rpm"
describing what it is and documenting the compatible.

Or I can push it under rpm-requests{}.

Konrad
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>