| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20230406200055.GB19196@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 13:00:55 -0700
From: Fan Wu <wufan@...ux.microsoft.com>
To: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
Cc: corbet@....net, zohar@...ux.ibm.com, jmorris@...ei.org,
serge@...lyn.com, tytso@....edu, ebiggers@...nel.org,
axboe@...nel.dk, agk@...hat.com, snitzer@...nel.org,
eparis@...hat.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fscrypt@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
dm-devel@...hat.com, linux-audit@...hat.com,
roberto.sassu@...wei.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Deven Bowers <deven.desai@...ux.microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v9 02/16] ipe: add policy parser
On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 02:02:32PM -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 5:58???PM Fan Wu <wufan@...ux.microsoft.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Deven Bowers <deven.desai@...ux.microsoft.com>
> >
> > IPE's interpretation of the what the user trusts is accomplished through
> > its policy. IPE's design is to not provide support for a single trust
> > provider, but to support multiple providers to enable the end-user to
> > choose the best one to seek their needs.
> >
> > This requires the policy to be rather flexible and modular so that
> > integrity providers, like fs-verity, dm-verity, dm-integrity, or
> > some other system, can plug into the policy with minimal code changes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Deven Bowers <deven.desai@...ux.microsoft.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Fan Wu <wufan@...ux.microsoft.com>
>
> ...
>
> > ---
> > security/ipe/Makefile | 2 +
> > security/ipe/policy.c | 99 +++++++
> > security/ipe/policy.h | 77 ++++++
> > security/ipe/policy_parser.c | 515 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > security/ipe/policy_parser.h | 11 +
> > 5 files changed, 704 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 security/ipe/policy.c
> > create mode 100644 security/ipe/policy.h
> > create mode 100644 security/ipe/policy_parser.c
> > create mode 100644 security/ipe/policy_parser.h
> >
> > diff --git a/security/ipe/Makefile b/security/ipe/Makefile
> > index 571648579991..16bbe80991f1 100644
> > --- a/security/ipe/Makefile
> > +++ b/security/ipe/Makefile
> > @@ -8,3 +8,5 @@
> > obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_IPE) += \
> > hooks.o \
> > ipe.o \
> > + policy.o \
> > + policy_parser.o \
> > diff --git a/security/ipe/policy.c b/security/ipe/policy.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..e446f4b84152
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/security/ipe/policy.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include "ipe.h"
> > +#include "policy.h"
> > +#include "policy_parser.h"
> > +#include "digest.h"
> > +
> > +#include <linux/verification.h>
>
> Generally speaking the system/kernel-wide header files, e.g. headers
> using '<...>', tend to come before the local header files, e.g.
> headers using '"..."'. I wouldn't consider this a hard rule, but
> unless you have a reason to put the local header files first I would
> stick with convention here.
>
I agree we didn't follow the correct common pattern here, I will update
all header lines in the next version.
> > +/**
> > + * ipe_free_policy - Deallocate a given IPE policy.
> > + * @p: Supplies the policy to free.
> > + *
> > + * Safe to call on IS_ERR/NULL.
> > + */
> > +void ipe_free_policy(struct ipe_policy *p)
> > +{
> > + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(p))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + free_parsed_policy(p->parsed);
> > + if (!p->pkcs7)
> > + kfree(p->text);
> > + kfree(p->pkcs7);
> > + kfree(p);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int set_pkcs7_data(void *ctx, const void *data, size_t len,
> > + size_t asn1hdrlen)
> > +{
> > + struct ipe_policy *p = ctx;
> > +
> > + p->text = (const char *)data;
> > + p->textlen = len;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * ipe_new_policy - Allocate and parse an ipe_policy structure.
> > + *
> > + * @text: Supplies a pointer to the plain-text policy to parse.
> > + * @textlen: Supplies the length of @text.
> > + * @pkcs7: Supplies a pointer to a pkcs7-signed IPE policy.
> > + * @pkcs7len: Supplies the length of @pkcs7.
> > + *
> > + * @text/@...tlen Should be NULL/0 if @pkcs7/@...s7len is set.
> > + *
> > + * The result will still need to be associated with a context via
> > + * ipe_add_policy.
> > + *
> > + * Return:
> > + * * !IS_ERR - Success
> > + * * -EBADMSG - Policy is invalid
> > + * * -ENOMEM - Out of memory
> > + */
> > +struct ipe_policy *ipe_new_policy(const char *text, size_t textlen,
> > + const char *pkcs7, size_t pkcs7len)
> > +{
> > + int rc = 0;
> > + struct ipe_policy *new = NULL;
> > +
> > + new = kzalloc(sizeof(*new), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!new)
> > + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> > +
> > + if (!text) {
> > + new->pkcs7len = pkcs7len;
> > + new->pkcs7 = kmemdup(pkcs7, pkcs7len, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!new->pkcs7) {
> > + rc = -ENOMEM;
> > + goto err;
>
> As Roberto already pointed out, and you acknowledged, this leaks @new.
> However, as a FYI for future work, if you have a label with only one
> return instruction after the jump, e.g. the 'err' label here, you
> should replace the 'goto' with the single return instruction. Jumping
> just to immediately return is a bit silly, but if you also need to
> cleanup, e.g. free some memory, that's okay to use the goto/jump.
>
> > + }
> > +
> > + rc = verify_pkcs7_signature(NULL, 0, new->pkcs7, pkcs7len, NULL,
> > + VERIFYING_UNSPECIFIED_SIGNATURE,
> > + set_pkcs7_data, new);
> > + if (rc)
> > + goto err;
> > + } else {
> > + new->textlen = textlen;
> > + new->text = kstrdup(text, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!new->text) {
> > + rc = -ENOMEM;
> > + goto err;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + rc = parse_policy(new);
> > + if (rc)
> > + goto err;
> > +
> > + return new;
> > +err:
> > + return ERR_PTR(rc);
> > +}
>
> ...
>
> > diff --git a/security/ipe/policy.h b/security/ipe/policy.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..6af2d9a811ec
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/security/ipe/policy.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
> > + */
> > +#ifndef IPE_POLICY_H
> > +#define IPE_POLICY_H
> > +
> > +#include <linux/list.h>
> > +#include <linux/types.h>
> > +
> > +enum ipe_op_type {
> > + ipe_op_exec = 0,
> > + ipe_op_firmware,
> > + ipe_op_kernel_module,
> > + ipe_op_kexec_image,
> > + ipe_op_kexec_initramfs,
> > + ipe_op_ima_policy,
> > + ipe_op_ima_x509,
> > + ipe_op_max
> > +};
>
> I'm used to seeing enum values defined in ALL_CAPS to help visually
> distinguish them from variables and other assorted symbols, for
> example:
>
> enum ipe_op_type {
> IPE_OP_EXEC = 0,
> ...
> IPE_OP_MAX,
> };
>
> You might also want to consider prefixing IPE_OP_MAX with a couple
> underscores, e.g. __IPE_OP_MAX, to help distinguish it as a sentinel
> value and provide some protection in case you think you might ever
> want an op named "max". However, this really is a judgement call that
> is up to you.
>
> (Similar comments apply to the other IPE enums)
>
Yes this looks much better, I will also update all enums. Thanks for the advice.
> > +enum ipe_action_type {
> > + ipe_action_allow = 0,
> > + ipe_action_deny,
> > + ipe_action_max
> > +};
> > +
> > +enum ipe_prop_type {
> > + ipe_prop_max
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct ipe_prop {
> > + struct list_head next;
> > + enum ipe_prop_type type;
> > + void *value;
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct ipe_rule {
> > + enum ipe_op_type op;
> > + enum ipe_action_type action;
> > + struct list_head props;
> > + struct list_head next;
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct ipe_op_table {
> > + struct list_head rules;
> > + enum ipe_action_type default_action;
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct ipe_parsed_policy {
> > + const char *name;
> > + struct {
> > + u16 major;
> > + u16 minor;
> > + u16 rev;
> > + } version;
> > +
> > + enum ipe_action_type global_default_action;
> > +
> > + struct ipe_op_table rules[ipe_op_max];
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct ipe_policy {
> > + const char *pkcs7;
> > + size_t pkcs7len;
> > +
> > + const char *text;
> > + size_t textlen;
> > +
> > + struct ipe_parsed_policy *parsed;
> > +};
>
> None of the other structs in this header file have horizontally
> aligned variable names, you should pick one style and stick with it
> ... and that style should be the un-aligned style, e.g. what was used
> in 'struct ipe_rule'
>
Thanks for pointing that out, will also update this part.
> > +struct ipe_policy *ipe_new_policy(const char *text, size_t textlen,
> > + const char *pkcs7, size_t pkcs7len);
> > +void ipe_free_policy(struct ipe_policy *pol);
> > +
> > +#endif /* IPE_POLICY_H */
> > diff --git a/security/ipe/policy_parser.c b/security/ipe/policy_parser.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..c7ba0e865366
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/security/ipe/policy_parser.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,515 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include "policy.h"
> > +#include "policy_parser.h"
> > +#include "digest.h"
> > +
> > +#include <linux/parser.h>
> > +
> > +#define START_COMMENT '#'
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * new_parsed_policy - Allocate and initialize a parsed policy.
> > + *
> > + * Return:
> > + * * !IS_ERR - OK
> > + * * -ENOMEM - Out of memory
> > + */
> > +static struct ipe_parsed_policy *new_parsed_policy(void)
> > +{
> > + size_t i = 0;
> > + struct ipe_parsed_policy *p = NULL;
> > + struct ipe_op_table *t = NULL;
> > +
> > + p = kzalloc(sizeof(*p), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!p)
> > + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> > +
> > + p->global_default_action = ipe_action_max;
>
> I'm assuming you're using the "ipe_action_max" as an intentional bogus
> placeholder value here, yes? If that is the case, have you considered
> creating an "invalid" enum with an explicit zero value to save you
> this additional assignment (you are already using kzalloc())? For
> example:
>
> enum ipe_op_type {
> IPE_OP_INVALID = 0,
> IPE_OP_EXEC,
> ...
> IPE_OP_MAX,
> };
>
> enum ipe_action_type {
> IPE_ACTION_INVALID = 0,
> IPE_ACTION_ALLOW,
> ...
> IPE_ACTION_MAX,
> };
>
Yes, IPE_ACTION_MAX is kind of the INVALID value we are using here.
But I think we might be adding unnecessary complexity by using the
IPE_OP_INVLIAD enum here. Currently, we are using IPE_OP_MAX to
represent the number of operations we have, and we have allocated
an IPE_OP_MAX-sized array to store linked lists that link all rules
for each operation. If we were to add IPE_OP_INVLIAD to the enum
definition, then IPE_OP_MAX-1 would become the number of operations,
and we would need to change the index used to access the linked list
array. For example, to get the linked-list head of rules for the
EXEC operation, we would have to use index IPE_OP_EXEC-1. Is this
acceptable?
> > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(p->rules); ++i) {
> > + t = &p->rules[i];
> > +
> > + t->default_action = ipe_action_max;
> > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&t->rules);
> > + }
> > +
> > + return p;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * remove_comment - Truncate all chars following START_COMMENT in a string.
> > + *
> > + * @line: Supplies a poilcy line string for preprocessing.
>
> "policy" :)
>
> I'm definitely guilty of adding a lot of silly spelling errors to
> codebases over the years, so no worries here, but in case you haven't
> seen the codespell tool already, it might be something worth taking a
> look at sometime.
>
> * https://github.com/codespell-project/codespell
>
Thanks for the suggestion. I have found several other typos by using this.
> > + */
> > +static void remove_comment(char *line)
> > +{
> > + size_t i, len = 0;
> > +
> > + len = strlen(line);
> > + for (i = 0; i < len && line[i] != START_COMMENT; ++i)
> > + ;
>
> The kernel has a strchr() implementation which could simplify this,
> and possibly speed things up if there is an arch specific optimized
> implementation.
>
Yep this one is better, will switch to use it.
> > + line[i] = '\0';
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * remove_trailing_spaces - Truncate all trailing spaces in a string.
> > + *
> > + * @line: Supplies a poilcy line string for preprocessing.
> > + */
> > +static void remove_trailing_spaces(char *line)
> > +{
> > + size_t i, len = 0;
> > +
> > + len = strlen(line);
> > + for (i = len; i > 0 && (line[i - 1] == ' ' || line[i - 1] == '\t'); --i)
> > + ;
>
> You can probably drop the @len variable and just assign 'i =
> strlen(line)' in the for-loop initializer.
>
Yep, len is redundant here, will remove it.
> > + line[i] = '\0';
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * parse_version - Parse policy version.
> > + * @ver: Supplies a version string to be parsed.
> > + * @p: Supplies the partial parsed policy.
> > + *
> > + * Return:
> > + * * 0 - OK
> > + * * !0 - Standard errno
> > + */
> > +static int parse_version(char *ver, struct ipe_parsed_policy *p)
> > +{
> > + int rc = 0;
> > + size_t sep_count = 0;
> > + char *token;
> > + u16 *const cv[] = { &p->version.major, &p->version.minor, &p->version.rev };
> > +
> > + while ((token = strsep(&ver, ".")) != NULL) {
> > + /* prevent overflow */
> > + if (sep_count >= ARRAY_SIZE(cv)) {
> > + rc = -EBADMSG;
> > + goto err;
>
> Remember what I said above about not needing a 'goto' here? ;)
>
Yes just return is enough, will update it.
> > + }
> > +
> > + rc = kstrtou16(token, 10, cv[sep_count]);
> > + if (rc)
> > + goto err;
> > +
> > + ++sep_count;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* prevent underflow */
> > + if (sep_count != ARRAY_SIZE(cv))
> > + rc = -EBADMSG;
> > +
> > +err:
> > + return rc;
> > +}
> > +
> > +enum header_opt {
> > + ipe_header_policy_name = 0,
> > + ipe_header_policy_version,
> > + ipe_header_max
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const match_table_t header_tokens = {
> > + {ipe_header_policy_name, "policy_name=%s"},
> > + {ipe_header_policy_version, "policy_version=%s"},
> > + {ipe_header_max, NULL}
> > +};
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * parse_header - Parse policy header information.
> > + * @line: Supplies header line to be parsed.
> > + * @p: Supplies the partial parsed policy.
> > + *
> > + * Return:
> > + * * 0 - OK
> > + * * !0 - Standard errno
> > + */
> > +static int parse_header(char *line, struct ipe_parsed_policy *p)
> > +{
> > + int rc = 0;
> > + char *t, *ver = NULL;
> > + substring_t args[MAX_OPT_ARGS];
> > + size_t idx = 0;
> > +
> > + while ((t = strsep(&line, " \t")) != NULL) {
> > + int token;
> > +
> > + if (*t == '\0')
> > + continue;
> > + if (idx >= ipe_header_max) {
> > + rc = -EBADMSG;
> > + goto err;
> > + }
> > +
> > + token = match_token(t, header_tokens, args);
> > + if (token != idx) {
> > + rc = -EBADMSG;
> > + goto err;
> > + }
> > +
> > + switch (token) {
> > + case ipe_header_policy_name:
> > + p->name = match_strdup(&args[0]);
> > + if (!p->name)
> > + rc = -ENOMEM;
> > + break;
> > + case ipe_header_policy_version:
> > + ver = match_strdup(&args[0]);
> > + if (!ver) {
> > + rc = -ENOMEM;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + rc = parse_version(ver, p);
> > + break;
> > + default:
> > + rc = -EBADMSG;
> > + }
> > + if (rc)
> > + goto err;
> > + ++idx;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (idx != ipe_header_max) {
> > + rc = -EBADMSG;
> > + goto err;
> > + }
> > + goto out;
>
> Generally the normal, non-error case is structured so that the
> function can continue to fall through to the correct code without
> needed a 'goto'. I would suggest moving the 'err' label/code *after*
> the 'out' label/code so the normal case can just fall through without
> the goto; you will have to add a 'goto out' at the end of 'err', but
> that's the error case so we aren't going to worry too much about that.
>
> Put another (shorter) way, structure your code to optimize for the
> common, non-error case.
>
> Needless to say, this applies to other functions in this patch(set).
>
Thanks for pointing that out, I will update all the cases like this one.
> > +err:
> > + kfree(p->name);
> > + p->name = NULL;
> > +out:
> > + kfree(ver);
> > + return rc;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * is_default - Determine if the given token is "DEFAULT".
> > + * @token: Supplies the token string to be compared.
> > + *
> > + * Return:
> > + * * 0 - The token is not "DEFAULT"
> > + * * !0 - The token is "DEFAULT"
> > + */
> > +static bool is_default(char *token)
> > +{
> > + return !strcmp(token, "DEFAULT");
> > +}
>
> Let's be honest, "is_default()" isn't a great name, and it's a pretty
> trivial function too; I'm wondering if hiding the simple strcmp()
> behind an oddly named function is really all that helpful. I'm okay
> if you want to keep the function, but can we name it something else?
> Maybe "token_default(...)" or something similar?
>
I agree, I will take the name token_default.
> > +/**
> > + * free_rule - Free the supplied ipe_rule struct.
> > + * @r: Supplies the ipe_rule struct to be freed.
> > + */
>
> It might be worth mentioning that @r should be removed from any lists,
> e.g. list_empty() is true.
>
> > +static void free_rule(struct ipe_rule *r)
> > +{
> > + struct ipe_prop *p, *t;
> > +
> > + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(r))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + list_for_each_entry_safe(p, t, &r->props, next) {
> > + kfree(p);
> > + }
>
> That's interesting, I'm used to seeing a 'list_del()' call (or
> similar) before the list entry is freed. Although looking at
> list_for_each_entry_safe() I guess it is safe with the current
> implementation ... did you see this pattern elsewhere in the kernel?
> If so, where?
>
> Unless this is performance critical (I don't think it is?), it might
> be safer to do an explicit `list_del()` before free'ing the entries
> ... unless this is now a common pattern in the kernel and I just
> missed the memo.
>
I have double checked other use cases and found we were indeed wrong
here, I will add list_del calls in the next version.
> > + kfree(r);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const match_table_t operation_tokens = {
> > + {ipe_op_exec, "op=EXECUTE"},
> > + {ipe_op_firmware, "op=FIRMWARE"},
> > + {ipe_op_kernel_module, "op=KMODULE"},
> > + {ipe_op_kexec_image, "op=KEXEC_IMAGE"},
> > + {ipe_op_kexec_initramfs, "op=KEXEC_INITRAMFS"},
> > + {ipe_op_ima_policy, "op=IMA_POLICY"},
> > + {ipe_op_ima_x509, "op=IMA_X509_CERT"},
> > + {ipe_op_max, NULL}
> > +};
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * parse_operation - Parse the opeartion type given a token string.
> > + * @t: Supplies the token string to be parsed.
> > + *
> > + * Return: The parsed opeartion type.
> > + */
> > +static enum ipe_op_type parse_operation(char *t)
> > +{
> > + substring_t args[MAX_OPT_ARGS];
> > +
> > + return match_token(t, operation_tokens, args);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const match_table_t action_tokens = {
> > + {ipe_action_allow, "action=ALLOW"},
> > + {ipe_action_deny, "action=DENY"},
> > + {ipe_action_max, NULL}
> > +};
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * parse_action - Parse the action type given a token string.
> > + * @t: Supplies the token string to be parsed.
> > + *
> > + * Return: The parsed action type.
> > + */
> > +static enum ipe_action_type parse_action(char *t)
> > +{
> > + substring_t args[MAX_OPT_ARGS];
> > +
> > + return match_token(t, action_tokens, args);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const match_table_t property_tokens = {
> > + {ipe_prop_max, NULL}
> > +};
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * parse_property - Parse the property type given a token string.
> > + * @t: Supplies the token string to be parsed.
> > + * @r: Supplies the ipe_rule the parsed property will be associated with.
> > + *
> > + * Return:
> > + * * !IS_ERR - OK
> > + * * -ENOMEM - Out of memory
> > + * * -EBADMSG - The supplied token cannot be parsed
> > + */
> > +int parse_property(char *t, struct ipe_rule *r)
> > +{
> > + substring_t args[MAX_OPT_ARGS];
> > + struct ipe_prop *p = NULL;
> > + int rc = 0;
> > + int token;
> > + char *dup = NULL;
> > +
> > + p = kzalloc(sizeof(*p), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!p) {
> > + rc = -ENOMEM;
> > + goto err;
> > + }
> > +
> > + token = match_token(t, property_tokens, args);
> > +
> > + switch (token) {
> > + case ipe_prop_max:
> > + default:
> > + rc = -EBADMSG;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + list_add_tail(&p->next, &r->props);
> > +
> > +err:
> > + kfree(dup);
> > + return rc;
> > +}
>
> There is a lot of stuff in 'parse_property()' that doesn't make sense
> at this point in the patchset, including lots of unused variables.
> Considering that no valid properties are defined yet, why not just
> make this function return -EBADMSG in this patch? You can always
> populate it later when it becomes useful.
>
> int parse_property(...)
> {
> return -EBADMSG;
> }
>
Sure, I can restructure the patch to add them in the later patches.
> > +/**
> > + * parse_rule - parse a policy rule line.
> > + * @line: Supplies rule line to be parsed.
> > + * @p: Supplies the partial parsed policy.
> > + *
> > + * Return:
> > + * * !IS_ERR - OK
> > + * * -ENOMEM - Out of memory
> > + * * -EBADMSG - Policy syntax error
> > + */
> > +static int parse_rule(char *line, struct ipe_parsed_policy *p)
> > +{
> > + int rc = 0;
> > + bool first_token = true, is_default_rule = false;
> > + bool op_parsed = false;
> > + enum ipe_op_type op = ipe_op_max;
> > + enum ipe_action_type action = ipe_action_max;
> > + struct ipe_rule *r = NULL;
> > + char *t;
> > +
> > + r = kzalloc(sizeof(*r), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!r) {
> > + rc = -ENOMEM;
> > + goto err;
> > + }
> > +
> > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&r->next);
> > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&r->props);
> > +
> > + while (t = strsep(&line, " \t"), line) {
> > + if (*t == '\0')
> > + continue;
> > + if (first_token && is_default(t)) {
> > + is_default_rule = true;
> > + } else {
> > + if (!op_parsed) {
> > + op = parse_operation(t);
> > + if (op == ipe_op_max)
> > + rc = -EBADMSG;
> > + else
> > + op_parsed = true;
> > + } else {
> > + rc = parse_property(t, r);
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (rc)
> > + goto err;
> > + first_token = false;
> > + }
> > +
> > + action = parse_action(t);
> > + if (action == ipe_action_max) {
> > + rc = -EBADMSG;
> > + goto err;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (is_default_rule) {
> > + if (op == ipe_op_max) {
> > + if (p->global_default_action != ipe_action_max)
> > + rc = -EBADMSG;
> > + else
> > + p->global_default_action = action;
> > + } else {
> > + if (p->rules[op].default_action != ipe_action_max)
> > + rc = -EBADMSG;
> > + else
> > + p->rules[op].default_action = action;
> > + }
> > + free_rule(r);
> > + } else if (op != ipe_op_max && action != ipe_action_max) {
> > + r->op = op;
> > + r->action = action;
> > + list_add_tail(&r->next, &p->rules[op].rules);
>
> There is no way @rc could be non-zero here, right? If there is some
> chance of it being non-zero we could have a problem with the @rc check
> below jumping us to the 'err' label and free'ing a rule that has been
> added to the list.
>
> It might be better to move the list addition after the last error check.
>
Yes, rc cannot be non-zero here because all the rc assignments will just
go to the 'err' label. But I also agree that moving the list addition after
the last error check can avoid potential bugs in the future. I will update this part.
> > + } else {
> > + rc = -EBADMSG;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (rc)
> > + goto err;
> > +
> > + goto out;
> > +
> > +err:
> > + free_rule(r);
> > +out:
> > + return rc;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * free_parsed_policy - free a parsed policy structure.
> > + * @p: Supplies the parsed policy.
> > + */
> > +void free_parsed_policy(struct ipe_parsed_policy *p)
> > +{
> > + size_t i = 0;
> > + struct ipe_rule *pp, *t;
> > +
> > + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(p))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(p->rules); ++i)
> > + list_for_each_entry_safe(pp, t, &p->rules[i].rules, next)
> > + free_rule(pp);
> > +
> > + kfree(p);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * validate_policy - validate a parsed policy.
> > + * @p: Supplies the fully parsed policy.
> > + *
> > + * Given a policy structure that was just parsed, validate that all
> > + * necessary fields are present, initialized correctly, and all lines
> > + * parsed are have been consumed.
> > + *
> > + * A parsed policy can be an invalid state for use (a default was
> > + * undefined, a header was undefined) by just parsing the policy.
> > + *
> > + * Return:
> > + * * 0 - OK
> > + * * -EBADMSG - Policy is invalid
> > + */
> > +static int validate_policy(const struct ipe_parsed_policy *p)
> > +{
> > + int i = 0;
> > +
> > + if (p->global_default_action != ipe_action_max)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(p->rules); ++i) {
> > + if (p->rules[i].default_action == ipe_action_max)
> > + return -EBADMSG;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * parse_policy - Given a string, parse the string into an IPE policy.
> > + * @p: partially filled ipe_policy structure to populate with the result.
> > + * it must have text and textlen set.
> > + *
> > + * Return:
> > + * * 0 - OK
> > + * * -EBADMSG - Policy is invalid
> > + * * -ENOMEM - Out of Memory
> > + */
> > +int parse_policy(struct ipe_policy *p)
> > +{
> > + int rc = 0;
> > + size_t len;
> > + char *policy = NULL, *dup = NULL;
> > + char *line = NULL;
> > + bool header_parsed = false;
> > + struct ipe_parsed_policy *pp = NULL;
> > +
> > + if (!p->textlen)
> > + return -EBADMSG;
> > +
> > + policy = kmemdup_nul(p->text, p->textlen, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!policy)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > + dup = policy;
> > +
> > + pp = new_parsed_policy();
> > + if (IS_ERR(pp)) {
> > + rc = PTR_ERR(pp);
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > +
> > + while ((line = strsep(&policy, "\n\r")) != NULL) {
> > + remove_comment(line);
> > + remove_trailing_spaces(line);
>
> I think it might be very easy for 'remove_trailing_spaces()' to return
> the length of the string as it already knows where the string ends;
> perhaps the function could return the string length and we could get
> rid of the 'strlen()' call below?
>
Yes that's very easy, I will add a return value to remove_trailing_spaces().
> > + len = strlen(line);
> > + if (!len)
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + if (!header_parsed) {
> > + rc = parse_header(line, pp);
> > + if (rc)
> > + goto err;
> > + header_parsed = true;
> > + continue;
>
> Instead of the 'continue' above, why not just put the 'parse_rule()'
> call into the 'else' block of this if-then-else?
>
I agree that's a better structure, I will switch to use 'else'.
-Fan
> > + }
> > +
> > + rc = parse_rule(line, pp);
> > + if (rc)
> > + goto err;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (!header_parsed || validate_policy(pp)) {
> > + rc = -EBADMSG;
> > + goto err;
> > + }
> > +
> > + p->parsed = pp;
> > +
> > + goto out;
> > +err:
> > + free_parsed_policy(pp);
> > +out:
> > + kfree(dup);
> > +
> > + return rc;
> > +}
> > diff --git a/security/ipe/policy_parser.h b/security/ipe/policy_parser.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..699ca58a5a32
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/security/ipe/policy_parser.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
> > + */
> > +#ifndef IPE_POLICY_PARSER_H
> > +#define IPE_POLICY_PARSER_H
> > +
> > +int parse_policy(struct ipe_policy *p);
> > +void free_parsed_policy(struct ipe_parsed_policy *p);
> > +
> > +#endif /* IPE_POLICY_PARSER */
> > --
> > 2.39.0
>
> --
> paul-moore.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists