linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64/mm: don't WARN when alloc/free-ing device private pages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 6 Apr 2023 13:18:06 -0700
From:   John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
        Feiyang Chen <chenfeiyang@...ngson.cn>,
        Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>,
        Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@...dia.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64/mm: don't WARN when alloc/free-ing device private
 pages

On 4/6/23 13:07, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Apr 2023 21:05:15 -0700 John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com> wrote:
> 
>> Although CONFIG_DEVICE_PRIVATE and hmm_range_fault() and related
>> functionality was first developed on x86, it also works on arm64.
>> However, when trying this out on an arm64 system, it turns out that
>> there is a massive slowdown during the setup and teardown phases.
>>
>> This slowdown is due to lots of calls to WARN_ON()'s that are checking
>> for pages that are out of the physical range for the CPU. However,
>> that's a design feature of device private pages: they are specfically
>> chosen in order to be outside of the range of the CPU's true physical
>> pages.
>>
>> ...
>>
>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
>> @@ -1157,8 +1157,10 @@ int __meminit vmemmap_check_pmd(pmd_t *pmdp, int node,
>>  int __meminit vmemmap_populate(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, int node,
>>  		struct vmem_altmap *altmap)
>>  {
>> +/* Device private pages are outside of the CPU's physical page range. */
>> +#ifndef CONFIG_DEVICE_PRIVATE
>>  	WARN_ON((start < VMEMMAP_START) || (end > VMEMMAP_END));
> 
> For a simple expression like this to cause a "massive slowdown", I
> assume the WARN is triggering.  But changelog doesn't mention massive
> dmesg spewage?

Well, it should. Whoever wrote that needs to improve the changelog. :)

> 
> Given Ard's comments, perhaps a switch to WARN_ON_ONCE() would suit?

That would fix up the user-visible problems, which would be very nice.

Meanwhile, I'm trying to sort out whether this really is a false 
positive for arm64.

thanks,
-- 
John Hubbard
NVIDIA