[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <61f8e489-ae76-38d6-2da0-43cf3c17853d@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 12:03:27 +0800
From: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...wei.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: <yangyicong@...ilicon.com>, <linuxarm@...wei.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Shaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com>,
Jiucheng Xu <jiucheng.xu@...ogic.com>,
Khuong Dinh <khuong@...amperecomputing.com>,
Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>,
Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>,
Shuai Xue <xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...nel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>, Wu Hao <hao.wu@...el.com>,
Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, <linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Liang Kan <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/32] perf: Allow a PMU to have a parent
On 2023/4/4 21:41, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> Some PMUs have well defined parents such as PCI devices.
> As the device_initialize() and device_add() are all within
> pmu_dev_alloc() which is called from perf_pmu_register()
> there is no opportunity to set the parent from within a driver.
>
> Add a struct device *parent field to struct pmu and use that
> to set the parent.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
>
> ---
> Previously posted in CPMU series hence the change log.
> v3: No change
> ---
> include/linux/perf_event.h | 1 +
> kernel/events/core.c | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> index d5628a7b5eaa..b99db1eda72c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
> +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> @@ -303,6 +303,7 @@ struct pmu {
>
> struct module *module;
> struct device *dev;
> + struct device *parent;
> const struct attribute_group **attr_groups;
> const struct attribute_group **attr_update;
> const char *name;
> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
> index fb3e436bcd4a..a84c282221f2 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> @@ -11367,6 +11367,7 @@ static int pmu_dev_alloc(struct pmu *pmu)
>
> dev_set_drvdata(pmu->dev, pmu);
> pmu->dev->bus = &pmu_bus;
> + pmu->dev->parent = pmu->parent;
If there's no parent assigned, is it ok to add some check here? Then we can find it earlier
maybe at develop stage.
Thanks.
> pmu->dev->release = pmu_dev_release;
>
> ret = dev_set_name(pmu->dev, "%s", pmu->name);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists