lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 6 Apr 2023 10:25:10 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@...labora.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Joseph Chen <chenjh@...k-chips.com>,
        Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...guardiasur.com.ar>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] regulator: fan53555: Add support for RK860X

On 05/04/2023 21:47, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
> Extend the existing fan53555 driver to support the Rockchip RK860X
> regulators.
> 
> RK8600/RK8601 are fully compatible with FAN53555 regulators.
> 

> @@ -531,6 +634,18 @@ static const struct of_device_id __maybe_unused fan53555_dt_ids[] = {
>  	}, {
>  		.compatible = "fcs,fan53555",
>  		.data = (void *)FAN53555_VENDOR_FAIRCHILD
> +	}, {
> +		.compatible = "rockchip,rk8600",
> +		.data = (void *)FAN53555_VENDOR_ROCKCHIP
> +	}, {
> +		.compatible = "rockchip,rk8601",
> +		.data = (void *)FAN53555_VENDOR_ROCKCHIP
> +	}, {
> +		.compatible = "rockchip,rk8602",
> +		.data = (void *)RK8602_VENDOR_ROCKCHIP
> +	}, {
> +		.compatible = "rockchip,rk8603",
> +		.data = (void *)RK8602_VENDOR_ROCKCHIP
>  	}, {
>  		.compatible = "silergy,syr827",
>  		.data = (void *)FAN53555_VENDOR_SILERGY,
> @@ -637,6 +752,18 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id fan53555_id[] = {
>  	}, {
>  		.name = "fan53555",
>  		.driver_data = FAN53555_VENDOR_FAIRCHILD
> +	}, {
> +		.name = "rk8600",
> +		.driver_data = FAN53555_VENDOR_ROCKCHIP
> +	}, {
> +		.name = "rk8601",
> +		.driver_data = FAN53555_VENDOR_ROCKCHIP

Why do you need this entry match data if it is the same as rk8600?

> +	}, {
> +		.name = "rk8602",
> +		.driver_data = RK8602_VENDOR_ROCKCHIP
> +	}, {
> +		.name = "rk8603",
> +		.driver_data = RK8602_VENDOR_ROCKCHIP

Why do you need this entry match data if it is the same as rk8602?

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ