[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <eb4cf82d-f523-d5af-be18-25c37678a95a@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 10:32:49 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, tony@...mide.com, afd@...com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: omap: Convert omap.txt to yaml
On 05/04/2023 18:19, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> From: Andrew Davis <afd@...com>
>
> Convert omap.txt to yaml.
>
> + - description: TI AM43 SoC based platforms
> + items:
> + - enum:
> + - compulab,am437x-cm-t43
> + - ti,am437x-gp-evm
> + - ti,am437x-idk-evm
> + - ti,am437x-sk-evm
> + - pattern: '^ti,am4372[26789]$'
> + - const: ti,am43
> +
> + - description: TI AM57 SoC based platforms
> + items:
> + - enum:
> + - beagle,am5729-beagleboneai
> + - compulab,cl-som-am57x
> + - ti,am5718-idk
> + - ti,am5728-idk
> + - ti,am5748-idk
> + - pattern: '^ti,am57[0124][689]$'
I don't think my comments were resolved. I asked if it is possible to
make a board called "ti,am5718-idk" with "ti,am5749" or with "ti,am5708"?
What's more, you dropped several variations and compatibles against
original binding (all the "dra") and it is not explained in commit msg
at all.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists