linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: net: dsa: brcm,sf2: Drop unneeded "#address-cells/#size-cells"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <168074281806.15345.5290233853020245950.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 06 Apr 2023 01:00:18 +0000
From:   patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     andrew@...n.ch, f.fainelli@...il.com, olteanv@...il.com,
        davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
        pabeni@...hat.com, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: net: dsa: brcm,sf2: Drop unneeded
 "#address-cells/#size-cells"

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>:

On Tue,  4 Apr 2023 15:41:52 -0500 you wrote:
> There's no need for "#address-cells/#size-cells" in the brcm,sf2 node as
> no immediate child nodes have an address. What was probably intended was
> to put them in the 'ports' node, but that's not necessary as that is
> covered by ethernet-switch.yaml via dsa.yaml.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - dt-bindings: net: dsa: brcm,sf2: Drop unneeded "#address-cells/#size-cells"
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/f03789766905

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html