[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <168074339912.3678997.1094206754348749042.b4-ty@ellerman.id.au>
Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2023 11:09:59 +1000
From: Michael Ellerman <patch-notifications@...erman.id.au>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence
On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 08:46:56 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
> of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
> of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As
> part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the
> recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test
> for presence of a property and nothing more.
>
> [...]
Applied to powerpc/next.
[1/1] powerpc: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/857d423c74228cfa064f79ff3a16b163fdb8d542
cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists