lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ce162145-e88f-9c5f-6182-4a57e8efd586@huawei.com>
Date:   Thu, 6 Apr 2023 20:29:13 +0800
From:   Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@...wei.com>
To:     Yangtao Li <frank.li@...o.com>
CC:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <richard@....at>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ubifs: remove unnecessary kobject_del()

Hi,
>> I think we should still reserve the 'redundant' kobject_del(),
>> removing it won't bring any performance improvement.
> 
> Since it's redundant, why not to remove it.
> 

In my personal view, 'redundant' means removing kobject_del() is okay, 
it won't bring any bugs. But removing it won't make code more 
readability or gain any performance improvement, so it could be 
reserved. Whether to remove kobject_del() depends on UBIFS maintainer, I 
just help to check if the modification could affect the normal logic.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ