linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/32] perf: Allow a PMU to have a parent

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 6 Apr 2023 14:40:40 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Cc:     Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...wei.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        yangyicong@...ilicon.com, linuxarm@...wei.com,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Shaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com>,
        Jiucheng Xu <jiucheng.xu@...ogic.com>,
        Khuong Dinh <khuong@...amperecomputing.com>,
        Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>,
        Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>,
        Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>,
        Shuai Xue <xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...nel.org>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
        Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>, Wu Hao <hao.wu@...el.com>,
        Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Liang Kan <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/32] perf: Allow a PMU to have a parent

On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 11:16:07AM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:

> In the long run I agree it would be good.  Short term there are more instances of
> struct pmu that don't have parents than those that do (even after this series).
> We need to figure out what to do about those before adding checks on it being
> set.

Right, I don't think you've touched *any* of the x86 PMUs for example,
and getting everybody that boots an x86 kernel a warning isn't going to
go over well :-)