| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 07:13:59 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>
Cc: 代子为 (Ziwei Dai) <Ziwei.Dai@...soc.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
"frederic@...nel.org" <frederic@...nel.org>,
"quic_neeraju@...cinc.com" <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>,
"josh@...htriplett.org" <josh@...htriplett.org>,
"rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com" <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
"jiangshanlai@...il.com" <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
"rcu@...r.kernel.org" <rcu@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
王双 (Shuang Wang) <shuang.wang@...soc.com>,
辛依凡 (Yifan Xin) <Yifan.Xin@...soc.com>,
王科 (Ke Wang) <Ke.Wang@...soc.com>,
闫学文 (Xuewen Yan)
<Xuewen.Yan@...soc.com>,
牛志国 (Zhiguo Niu)
<Zhiguo.Niu@...soc.com>,
黄朝阳 (Zhaoyang Huang)
<zhaoyang.huang@...soc.com>
Subject: Re: 答复: [PATCH V2] rcu: Make sure new krcp free business is handled
after the wanted rcu grace period.
On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 06:44:15AM +0200, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 08:46:15PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 01:38:09AM +0000, 代子为 (Ziwei Dai) wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----邮件原件-----
> > > > 发件人: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
> > > > 发送时间: 2023年4月6日 2:46
> > > > 收件人: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
> > > > 抄送: 代子为 (Ziwei Dai) <Ziwei.Dai@...soc.com>; urezki@...il.com; frederic@...nel.org; quic_neeraju@...cinc.com;
> > > > josh@...htriplett.org; rostedt@...dmis.org; mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com; jiangshanlai@...il.com; rcu@...r.kernel.org;
> > > > linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; 王双 (Shuang Wang) <shuang.wang@...soc.com>; 辛依凡 (Yifan Xin) <Yifan.Xin@...soc.com>; 王科
> > > > (Ke Wang) <Ke.Wang@...soc.com>; 闫学文 (Xuewen Yan) <Xuewen.Yan@...soc.com>; 牛志国 (Zhiguo Niu)
> > > > <Zhiguo.Niu@...soc.com>; 黄朝阳 (Zhaoyang Huang) <zhaoyang.huang@...soc.com>
> > > > 主题: Re: [PATCH V2] rcu: Make sure new krcp free business is handled after the wanted rcu grace period.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 注意: 这封邮件来自于外部。除非你确定邮件内容安全，否则不要点击任何链接和附件。
> > > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the
> > > > sender and know the content is safe.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 02:12:02PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Apr 5, 2023 at 1:39 PM Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 8:43 AM Ziwei Dai <ziwei.dai@...soc.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > In kfree_rcu_monitor(), new free business at krcp is attached to
> > > > > > > any free channel at krwp. kfree_rcu_monitor() is responsible to
> > > > > > > make sure new free business is handled after the rcu grace period.
> > > > > > > But if there is any none-free channel at krwp already, that means
> > > > > > > there is an on-going rcu work, which will cause the
> > > > > > > kvfree_call_rcu()-triggered free business is done before the wanted rcu grace period ends.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This commit ignore krwp which has non-free channel at
> > > > > > > kfree_rcu_monitor(), to fix the issue that kvfree_call_rcu() loses effectiveness.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Below is the css_set obj "from_cset" use-after-free case caused by
> > > > > > > kvfree_call_rcu() losing effectiveness.
> > > > > > > CPU 0 calls rcu_read_lock(), then use "from_cset", then hard irq
> > > > > > > comes, the task is schedule out.
> > > > > > > CPU 1 calls kfree_rcu(cset, rcu_head), willing to free "from_cset" after new gp.
> > > > > > > But "from_cset" is freed right after current gp end. "from_cset" is reallocated.
> > > > > > > CPU 0 's task arrives back, references "from_cset"'s member, which causes crash.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > CPU 0 CPU 1
> > > > > > > count_memcg_event_mm()
> > > > > > > |rcu_read_lock() <---
> > > > > > > |mem_cgroup_from_task()
> > > > > > > |// css_set_ptr is the "from_cset" mentioned on CPU 1
> > > > > > > |css_set_ptr = rcu_dereference((task)->cgroups) |// Hard irq
> > > > > > > comes, current task is scheduled out.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > cgroup_attach_task()
> > > > > > > |cgroup_migrate()
> > > > > > > |cgroup_migrate_execute()
> > > > > > > |css_set_move_task(task, from_cset, to_cset, true)
> > > > > > > |cgroup_move_task(task, to_cset)
> > > > > > > |rcu_assign_pointer(.., to_cset)
> > > > > > > |...
> > > > > > > |cgroup_migrate_finish()
> > > > > > > |put_css_set_locked(from_cset)
> > > > > > > |from_cset->refcount return 0
> > > > > > > |kfree_rcu(cset, rcu_head) // means to free from_cset after new gp
> > > > > > > |add_ptr_to_bulk_krc_lock()
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > |schedule_delayed_work(&krcp->monitor_work, ..)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > kfree_rcu_monitor()
> > > > > > > |krcp->bulk_head[0]'s work attached to krwp->bulk_head_free[]
> > > > > > > |queue_rcu_work(system_wq, &krwp->rcu_work)
> > > > > > > |if rwork->rcu.work is not in WORK_STRUCT_PENDING_BIT state,
> > > > > > > |call_rcu(&rwork->rcu,
> > > > > > > rcu_work_rcufn) <--- request a new gp
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > // There is a perious call_rcu(.., rcu_work_rcufn)
> > > > > > > // gp end, rcu_work_rcufn() is called.
> > > > > > > rcu_work_rcufn()
> > > > > > > |__queue_work(..,
> > > > > > > rwork->wq, &rwork->work);
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > |kfree_rcu_work()
> > > > > > > |krwp->bulk_head_free[0] bulk is freed before new gp end!!!
> > > > > > > |The "from_cset" is freed before new gp end.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > // the task is scheduled in after many ms.
> > > > > > > |css_set_ptr->subsys[(subsys_id) <--- Caused kernel crash, because css_set_ptr is freed.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > v2: Use helper function instead of inserted code block at kfree_rcu_monitor().
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Fixes: c014efeef76a ("rcu: Add multiple in-flight batches of
> > > > > > > kfree_rcu() work")
> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ziwei Dai <ziwei.dai@...soc.com>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please update the fixes tag to:
> > > > > > 5f3c8d620447 ("rcu/tree: Maintain separate array for vmalloc ptrs")
> > > > >
> > > > > Vlad pointed out in another thread that the fix is actually to 34c881745549.
> > > > >
> > > > > So just to be sure, it could be updated to:
> > > > > Fixes: 34c881745549 ("rcu: Support kfree_bulk() interface in
> > > > > kfree_rcu()")
> > > > > Fixes: 5f3c8d620447 ("rcu/tree: Maintain separate array for vmalloc
> > > > > ptrs")
> > > >
> > > > Ziwei Dai, does this change in Fixes look good to you?
> > > >
> > > > If so, I will update the commit log in this commit that I am planning to submit into v6.3. It is strictly speaking not a v6.3 regression,
> > > > but it is starting to show up in the wild and the patch is contained enough to be considered an urgent fix.
> > > >
> > > > Thanx, Paul
> > >
> > > Hi Paul, it looks good to me and thanks!
> >
> > Thank you, and I will fix on my next rebase.
> >
> After heavy testing over night i do not see that any warnings
> are triggered:
>
> Tested-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@...il.com>
Thank you very much!!! I will apply this during my upcoming rebase.
Thanx, Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists