linux-kernel - [PATCH v1] swiotlb: fix a braino in the alignment check fix

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230406143539.25-1-petrtesarik@huaweicloud.com>
Date:   Thu,  6 Apr 2023 16:35:39 +0200
From:   Petr Tesarik <petrtesarik@...weicloud.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Petr Tesarik <petr.tesarik.ext@...wei.com>,
        iommu@...ts.linux.dev (open list:DMA MAPPING HELPERS),
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list)
Cc:     Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>, petr@...arici.cz
Subject: [PATCH v1] swiotlb: fix a braino in the alignment check fix

From: Petr Tesarik <petr.tesarik.ext@...wei.com>

The alignment mask in swiotlb_do_find_slots() masks off the high
bits which are not relevant for the alignment, so multiple
requirements are combined with a bitwise OR rather than AND.
In plain English, the stricter the alignment, the more bits must
be set in iotlb_align_mask.

Confusion may arise from the fact that the same variable is also
used to mask off the offset within a swiotlb slot, which is
achieved with a bitwise AND.

Fixes: 0eee5ae10256 ("swiotlb: fix slot alignment checks")
Reported-by: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAA42JLa1y9jJ7BgQvXeUYQh-K2mDNHd2BYZ4iZUz33r5zY7oAQ@mail.gmail.com/
Reported-by: Kelsey Steele <kelseysteele@...ux.microsoft.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230405003549.GA21326@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net/
Signed-off-by: Petr Tesarik <petr.tesarik.ext@...wei.com>
Tested-by: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
---
 kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
index 5b919ef832b6..dac42a2ad588 100644
--- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
+++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
@@ -623,7 +623,7 @@ static int swiotlb_do_find_slots(struct device *dev, int area_index,
 		phys_to_dma_unencrypted(dev, mem->start) & boundary_mask;
 	unsigned long max_slots = get_max_slots(boundary_mask);
 	unsigned int iotlb_align_mask =
-		dma_get_min_align_mask(dev) & ~(IO_TLB_SIZE - 1);
+		dma_get_min_align_mask(dev) | alloc_align_mask;
 	unsigned int nslots = nr_slots(alloc_size), stride;
 	unsigned int offset = swiotlb_align_offset(dev, orig_addr);
 	unsigned int index, slots_checked, count = 0, i;
@@ -639,8 +639,8 @@ static int swiotlb_do_find_slots(struct device *dev, int area_index,
 	 * allocations.
 	 */
 	if (alloc_size >= PAGE_SIZE)
-		iotlb_align_mask &= PAGE_MASK;
-	iotlb_align_mask &= alloc_align_mask;
+		iotlb_align_mask |= ~PAGE_MASK;
+	iotlb_align_mask &= ~(IO_TLB_SIZE - 1);
 
 	/*
 	 * For mappings with an alignment requirement don't bother looping to
-- 
2.25.1