[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1654e2d5-5a32-a253-e335-0ee42f69f5ef@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 16:42:02 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Yair Podemsky <ypodemsk@...hat.com>, linux@...linux.org.uk,
mpe@...erman.id.au, npiggin@...il.com, christophe.leroy@...roup.eu,
hca@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com, agordeev@...ux.ibm.com,
borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com, svens@...ux.ibm.com,
davem@...emloft.net, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org,
hpa@...or.com, will@...nel.org, aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, arnd@...db.de, keescook@...omium.org,
paulmck@...nel.org, jpoimboe@...nel.org, samitolvanen@...gle.com,
ardb@...nel.org, juerg.haefliger@...onical.com,
rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk, geert+renesas@...der.be,
tony@...mide.com, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
sebastian.reichel@...labora.com, nick.hawkins@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, vschneid@...hat.com, dhildenb@...hat.com,
alougovs@...hat.com, jannh@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm/mmu_gather: send tlb_remove_table_smp_sync IPI
only to CPUs in kernel mode
On 06.04.23 16:04, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 03:29:28PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 09:38:50AM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>>
>>>> To actually hit this path you're doing something really dodgy.
>>>
>>> Apparently khugepaged is using the same infrastructure:
>>>
>>> $ grep tlb_remove_table khugepaged.c
>>> tlb_remove_table_sync_one();
>>> tlb_remove_table_sync_one();
>>>
>>> So just enabling khugepaged will hit that path.
>>
>> Urgh, WTF..
>>
>> Let me go read that stuff :/
>
> At the very least the one on collapse_and_free_pmd() could easily become
> a call_rcu() based free.
>
> I'm not sure I'm following what collapse_huge_page() does just yet.
It wants to replace a leaf page table by a THP (Transparent Huge Page
mapped by a PMD). So we want to rip out a leaf page table while other
code (GUP-fast) might still be walking it. In contrast to freeing the
page table, we put it into a list where it can be reuse when having to
PTE-map a THP again.
Now, similar to after freeing the page table, someone else could reuse
that page table and modify it.
If we have GUP-fast walking the page table while that is happening,
we're in trouble. So we have to make sure GUP-fast is done before
enqueuing the now-free page table.
That's why the tlb_remove_table_sync_one() was recently added (by Jann
IIRC).
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists