[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=VvgbPKQsOirMa-k0PE-KAvjWy+iMWd0TCbysYirwEH7w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2023 12:53:47 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/14] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Fix trogdor qspi pin config
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 11:11 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 23/03/2023 18:30, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> > In commit 7ec3e67307f8 ("arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180-trogdor: add initial
> > trogdor and lazor dt") we specified the pull settings on the boot SPI
> > (the qspi) data lines as pullups to "park" the lines. This seemed like
> > the right thing to do, but I never really probed the lines to confirm.
> >
>
>
> > &qup_i2c2_default {
> > @@ -1336,6 +1340,22 @@ p_sensor_int_l: p-sensor-int-l-state {
> > bias-disable;
> > };
> >
> > + qspi_sleep: qspi-sleep-state {
> > + pins = "gpio63", "gpio64", "gpio65", "gpio68";
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * When we're not actively transferring we want pins as GPIOs
> > + * with output disabled so that the quad SPI IP block stops
> > + * driving them. We rely on the normal pulls configured in
> > + * the active state and don't redefine them here. Also note
> > + * that we don't need the reverse (output-enable) in the
> > + * normal mode since the "output-enable" only matters for
> > + * GPIO function.
> > + */
> > + function = "gpio";
> > + output-disable;
>
> Doug,
>
> I acked some of your patches, but I assumed you tested all this. It
> turns out you never run dtbs_check on the patches you sent.
I'm fairly certain that I ran dtbs_check and confirmed that no new
errors were introduced on the device tree files that this patch series
cleaned up. Did I miss one? I did not try to go through and fix all
examples of people using "input-enable" across all Qualcomm device
trees, though. Those old device trees still work even if they're using
the now-deprecated bindings. When deprecating something my
understanding is that it's not required to go back and immediately
transition all old device tree files.
If having the "input-enable: false" in the bindings is causing huge
problems we could do a blank search-and-replace to rename it to
"output-disable", at least for places under "tlmm". Even if there are
cases where it's superfluous it would at least make the bindings
validate.
-Doug
Powered by blists - more mailing lists