[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <000000000000e15c0905f8c5101b@google.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2023 13:42:38 -0700
From: syzbot <syzbot+6b7df7d5506b32467149@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
To: adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, tytso@....edu
Subject: [syzbot] [ext4?] possible deadlock in ext4_multi_mount_protect
Hello,
syzbot found the following issue on:
HEAD commit: f2afccfefe7b Merge tag 'net-6.3-rc6-2' of git://git.kernel..
git tree: upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=10094d79c80000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=d3500b143c204867
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=6b7df7d5506b32467149
compiler: gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2
Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.
Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/a183ba13acb3/disk-f2afccfe.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/ffdb9ee4cb62/vmlinux-f2afccfe.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/8e8bbb25f0c1/bzImage-f2afccfe.xz
IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+6b7df7d5506b32467149@...kaller.appspotmail.com
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.3.0-rc5-syzkaller-00137-gf2afccfefe7b #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor.3/27708 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888065700460 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ext4_multi_mount_protect+0x50d/0xac0 fs/ext4/mmp.c:343
but task is already holding lock:
ffff8880657000e0 (&type->s_umount_key#31){++++}-{3:3}, at: vfs_fsconfig_locked fs/fsopen.c:253 [inline]
ffff8880657000e0 (&type->s_umount_key#31){++++}-{3:3}, at: __do_sys_fsconfig+0xa30/0xc20 fs/fsopen.c:439
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (&type->s_umount_key#31){++++}-{3:3}:
down_read+0x3d/0x50 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1520
__do_sys_quotactl_fd+0x27e/0x3f0 fs/quota/quota.c:999
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
-> #0 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}-{0:0}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3098 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3217 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3832 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2ec7/0x5d40 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5056
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5669 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1af/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5634
percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline]
__sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1477 [inline]
sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1552 [inline]
write_mmp_block+0xc4/0x820 fs/ext4/mmp.c:50
ext4_multi_mount_protect+0x50d/0xac0 fs/ext4/mmp.c:343
__ext4_remount fs/ext4/super.c:6543 [inline]
ext4_reconfigure+0x242b/0x2b60 fs/ext4/super.c:6642
reconfigure_super+0x40c/0xa30 fs/super.c:956
vfs_fsconfig_locked fs/fsopen.c:254 [inline]
__do_sys_fsconfig+0xa3a/0xc20 fs/fsopen.c:439
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&type->s_umount_key#31);
lock(sb_writers#4);
lock(&type->s_umount_key#31);
lock(sb_writers#4);
*** DEADLOCK ***
2 locks held by syz-executor.3/27708:
#0: ffff888078129070 (&fc->uapi_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __do_sys_fsconfig+0x521/0xc20 fs/fsopen.c:437
#1: ffff8880657000e0 (&type->s_umount_key#31){++++}-{3:3}, at: vfs_fsconfig_locked fs/fsopen.c:253 [inline]
#1: ffff8880657000e0 (&type->s_umount_key#31){++++}-{3:3}, at: __do_sys_fsconfig+0xa30/0xc20 fs/fsopen.c:439
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 27708 Comm: syz-executor.3 Not tainted 6.3.0-rc5-syzkaller-00137-gf2afccfefe7b #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/30/2023
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0xd9/0x150 lib/dump_stack.c:106
check_noncircular+0x25f/0x2e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2178
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3098 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3217 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3832 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2ec7/0x5d40 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5056
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5669 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1af/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5634
percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline]
__sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1477 [inline]
sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1552 [inline]
write_mmp_block+0xc4/0x820 fs/ext4/mmp.c:50
ext4_multi_mount_protect+0x50d/0xac0 fs/ext4/mmp.c:343
__ext4_remount fs/ext4/super.c:6543 [inline]
ext4_reconfigure+0x242b/0x2b60 fs/ext4/super.c:6642
reconfigure_super+0x40c/0xa30 fs/super.c:956
vfs_fsconfig_locked fs/fsopen.c:254 [inline]
__do_sys_fsconfig+0xa3a/0xc20 fs/fsopen.c:439
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
RIP: 0033:0x7f4a4d08c169
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 f1 19 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007f4a4dd13168 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000001af
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f4a4d1ac050 RCX: 00007f4a4d08c169
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000007 RDI: 0000000000000004
RBP: 00007f4a4d0e7ca1 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 00007ffc3d17db8f R14: 00007f4a4dd13300 R15: 0000000000022000
</TASK>
EXT4-fs (loop3): re-mounted 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000. Quota mode: writeback.
---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@...glegroups.com.
syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists