[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3eaa1264-2ab4-fd1d-8871-47c2414cbc29@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2023 08:24:12 -0500
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To: Ryosuke Yasuoka <ryasuoka@...hat.com>,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>
Cc: djwong@...nel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: Use for_each_perag() to iterate all available AGs
On 4/6/23 11:03 AM, Ryosuke Yasuoka wrote:
> Eric,
>
> I failed to reply to you since I got some mistakes.
> Let me re-send my reply just in case.
>
> Thank you for reviewing my requests.
>
>> Can you explain what goes wrong if it is zero? Is there a test for this?
>>
>> If it's a general problem, what if the other 2 callers pass in the variable
>> start_agno with a value of 0?
> Sorry I couldn't prepare any tests to confirm what happens if it is zero
> because it is a kind of general problem.
>
> IIUC, passing zero to for_each_perag_wrap() is not problematic.
...
> OTOH, since we have already a for_each_perag() macro, which just iterates all AG
> from 0 and doesn't wrap, I think it is simpler to use for_earch_perag().
>
> Regards,
> Ryosuke
Ok - I couldn't tell from the original email if this was a bugfix or a
cleanup, and wanted to be sure.
Thanks!
-Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists