linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3 2/5] regulator: qcom

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 7 Apr 2023 20:29:20 +0530
From:   Devi Priya <quic_devipriy@...cinc.com>
To:     Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, <agross@...nel.org>,
        <andersson@...nel.org>, <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        <broonie@...nel.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <quic_srichara@...cinc.com>, <quic_sjaganat@...cinc.com>,
        <quic_kathirav@...cinc.com>, <quic_arajkuma@...cinc.com>,
        <quic_anusha@...cinc.com>, <quic_ipkumar@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/5] regulator: qcom_smd: Add MP5496 S1 regulator



On 4/7/2023 1:07 AM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> 
> 
> On 6.04.2023 09:00, Devi Priya wrote:
>> Adding support for MP5496 S1 regulator on IPQ9574 SoC.
>>
>> Co-developed-by: Praveenkumar I <quic_ipkumar@...cinc.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Praveenkumar I <quic_ipkumar@...cinc.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Devi Priya <quic_devipriy@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>>   Changes in V3:
>> 	- No change
>>
>>   drivers/regulator/qcom_smd-regulator.c | 10 ++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/qcom_smd-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/qcom_smd-regulator.c
>> index 6f722b2d682e..cb77b3bd1723 100644
>> --- a/drivers/regulator/qcom_smd-regulator.c
>> +++ b/drivers/regulator/qcom_smd-regulator.c
>> @@ -749,6 +749,15 @@ static const struct regulator_desc pms405_pldo600 = {
>>   	.ops = &rpm_smps_ldo_ops,
>>   };
>>   
>> +static const struct regulator_desc mp5496_smpa1 = {
>> +	.linear_ranges = (struct linear_range[]) {
>> +		REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(600000, 0, 127, 12500),
>> +	},
>> +	.n_linear_ranges = 1,
>> +	.n_voltages = 128,
>> +	.ops = &rpm_mp5496_ops,
>> +};
>> +
> As far as I can tell, this is identical to struct mp5496_smpa2, so
> this patch could come down to:
> 
> - static const struct regulator_desc mp5496_smpa1 = {
> + static const struct regulator_desc mp5496_smps = {
> 
> 
> 
> +	{ "s1", QCOM_SMD_RPM_SMPA, 1, &mp5496_smps, "s1" },
> -  	{ "s2", QCOM_SMD_RPM_SMPA, 2, &mp5496_smpa2, "s2" },
> +	{ "s2", QCOM_SMD_RPM_SMPA, 2, &mp5496_smps, "s2" },
> 
Yes, right. Will update it
> Konrad
>>   static const struct regulator_desc mp5496_smpa2 = {
>>   	.linear_ranges = (struct linear_range[]) {
>>   		REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(600000, 0, 127, 12500),
>> @@ -794,6 +803,7 @@ struct rpm_regulator_data {
>>   };
>>   
>>   static const struct rpm_regulator_data rpm_mp5496_regulators[] = {
>> +	{ "s1", QCOM_SMD_RPM_SMPA, 1, &mp5496_smpa1, "s1" },
>>   	{ "s2", QCOM_SMD_RPM_SMPA, 2, &mp5496_smpa2, "s2" },
>>   	{ "l2", QCOM_SMD_RPM_LDOA, 2, &mp5496_ldoa2, "l2" },
>>   	{}
Best Regards,
Devi Priya