[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=Uri8DUDCGL=X82pvX0xKFZyFuXkeK51L264fFZCB+7Cw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2023 09:22:55 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Nikita Travkin <nikita@...n.ru>
Cc: agross@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org,
quic_srivasam@...cinc.com, judyhsiao@...omium.org,
mka@...omium.org, cros-qcom-dts-watchers@...omium.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Don't enable lpass
clocks by default
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 8:14 AM Nikita Travkin <nikita@...n.ru> wrote:
>
> lpass clocks are usually blocked from HLOS by the firmware and
> instead are managed by the ADSP. Mark them as reserved and explicitly
> enable in the CrOS boards that have special, cooperative firmware.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nikita Travkin <nikita@...n.ru>
> Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
> ---
> v5: minor style changes (Konrad)
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor.dtsi | 8 ++++++++
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi | 4 ++++
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
I probably would have put a note in the commit message about why you
chose not to enable these for IDP (AKA summarize the results of the
conversation [1] in your v3 post). IMO not worth spinning a v6 just
for this, though.
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/3557aa94-6a83-d054-a9d9-81751165eb8a@linaro.org
Powered by blists - more mailing lists