[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKwvOdkFK3f6zdkw4Xpa9WpTx6159GWF8J2rtMHoChStu9svVg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2023 10:44:33 -0700
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
Cc: ccaulfie@...hat.com, teigland@...hat.com, nathan@...nel.org,
cluster-devel@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: dlm: remove unused is_granted function
On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 10:59 AM Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> clang with W=1 reports
> fs/dlm/lock.c:239:19: error: unused function
> 'is_granted' [-Werror,-Wunused-function]
> static inline int is_granted(struct dlm_lkb *lkb)
> ^
> This function is not used so remove it.
How about instead of remove it, we see if we can reuse it?
Grep for DLM_LKSTS_GRANTED. The comparisons on:
2668: if (lkb->lkb_status != DLM_LKSTS_GRANTED)
2787: if (lkb->lkb_status == DLM_LKSTS_GRANTED &&
3749: if (lkb->lkb_status != DLM_LKSTS_GRANTED)
all look like they ought to.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
> ---
> fs/dlm/lock.c | 5 -----
> 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/dlm/lock.c b/fs/dlm/lock.c
> index 1582c8b1404c..b9c124b88f15 100644
> --- a/fs/dlm/lock.c
> +++ b/fs/dlm/lock.c
> @@ -236,11 +236,6 @@ static inline int is_altmode(struct dlm_lkb *lkb)
> return test_bit(DLM_SBF_ALTMODE_BIT, &lkb->lkb_sbflags);
> }
>
> -static inline int is_granted(struct dlm_lkb *lkb)
> -{
> - return (lkb->lkb_status == DLM_LKSTS_GRANTED);
> -}
> -
> static inline int is_remote(struct dlm_rsb *r)
> {
> DLM_ASSERT(r->res_nodeid >= 0, dlm_print_rsb(r););
> --
> 2.27.0
>
--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists