[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <070b55eb-504c-f505-8b13-a903d5ec7564@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2023 21:18:38 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm630: move DSI opp-table out of
soc node
On 07/04/2023 18:34, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 09:39:00PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 27/03/2023 21:39, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>>> On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 11:16:05AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> The soc node is supposed to have only device nodes with MMIO addresses,
>>>> so move the DSI OPP out of it (it is used also by second DSI1 on
>>>> SDM660):
>>>>
>>>
>>> This node has been moved into the dsi node, so if we still want this,
>>> could you please update the commit message.
>>
>> The OPP table has been moved *out of* DSI node. The v1 was moving
>> inside, but this was not good approach, thus v2 moves it out.
>>
>> I don't understand what shall be updated here.
>>
>
> The commit message doesn't reflect what's in linux-next today and the
> patch doesn't apply.
>
It seems you applied v1. It's okay, yet would be nice to clean up so I
will send a follow-up patch.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists