[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72kD_ESDSh-gVmUS18HtVmkY=bgxkR7Wo=OiwfMyyD8EFw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2023 01:59:45 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Vinay Varma <varmavinaym@...il.com>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>, alicef@...cef.me,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] scripts: `make rust-analyzer` for out-of-tree modules
On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 8:55 PM Miguel Ojeda
<miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com> wrote:
>
> No problem -- thanks!
>
> Note that we may need a rebase after
> https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/20230307120736.75492-1-nmi@metaspace.dk/
> (or equivalent) lands in `rust-fixes`. So perhaps wait for that, then
> rebase (especially if we go with the EAFP style), and then others may
> want to give it a spin for a re-test.
>
> When you rebase, please consider putting `f"{name}.o"` inside the
> function to avoid repetition, and perhaps consider inverting the
> condition to avoid indenting the file further (and reducing the diff).
> It makes the "Skip ..." comment more understandable (otherwise, you
> may want to change the comment to "Only process ..." or similar
> instead of using "Skip ...").
The EAFP style change landed in `rust-fixes` at
https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/commit/5c7548d5a25306dcdb97689479be81cacc8ce596.
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists