[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ce8d7dce-ac20-91d7-bbb5-db80997b0730@nvidia.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2023 08:14:46 +0000
From: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@...dia.com>
To: Lei Lei2 Yin <yinlei2@...ovo.com>,
"kbusch@...nel.org" <kbusch@...nel.org>,
"axboe@...com" <axboe@...com>, "hch@....de" <hch@....de>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>
CC: "linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"cybeyond@...mail.com" <cybeyond@...mail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] nvme: fix double blk_mq_complete_request for timeout
request with low probability
On 4/8/23 01:04, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
>
>> [ 2777.253091] <TASK>
>> [ 2777.253102] nvme_failover_req+0x10a/0x120 [nvme_core]
>> [ 2777.255302] blk_complete_reqs+0x3e/0x60
>> [ 2777.255726] __do_softirq+0xb6/0x2ad
>> [ 2777.256139] ? __pfx_smpboot_thread_fn+0x10/0x10
>> [ 2777.256556] run_ksoftirqd+0x28/0x40
>> [ 2777.256978] smpboot_thread_fn+0xdb/0x1d0
>> [ 2777.257399] kthread+0xd7/0x100
>> [ 2777.257827] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
>> [ 2777.258253] ret_from_fork+0x29/0x50
>> [ 2777.258695] </TASK>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lei Yin <yinlei2@...ovo.com>
>> ---
>>
> Can you please add blktests for this fix under nvme category ?
>
>
When you do please CC me and Shinichiro (shinichiro.kawasaki@....com).
-ck
Powered by blists - more mailing lists